上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 94-107.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

走向文化批评的“接合”理论——兼论斯图亚特·霍尔对马克思思想的接受

  

  1. 南京师范大学 文学院
  • 出版日期:2025-11-11 发布日期:2025-11-27
  • 作者简介:
    李永新,南京师范大学文学院教授、博士生导师。研究方向:马克思主义文论及西方美学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(24&ZD228)

“Articulation”in Its Turn Towards Cultural Criticism —An Analysis of Stuart Hall’s Engagement with Marxism

  1. School of Chinese Language and Literature, Nanjing Normal University
  • Online:2025-11-11 Published:2025-11-27

摘要:

经过 20多年的接受与研究,斯图亚特·霍尔提出的“接合”理论逐步由一个重要的文化研究概念转变为一个文化批评概念。不过,“articulation”开始时存在多种汉语译法,最后被确定译为“接合”,其“连接”“结合”意义得到不断重视。霍尔的“接合”理论在早期受到阿尔都塞的影响,深入发掘马克思的生产理论、理论思维和历史现实、历史唯物主义中存在的复杂接合关系,到20世纪70年代后期则受到葛兰西领导权理论的影响,强调语言通过意义冲突和斗争实现了与外部世界的接合,在为世界赋义的同时也实现了对具体历史情势的建构与表达。新世纪的中国文论在接受“接合”理论时,将其运用于文化批评领域,认为其能够动态地连接理论与现实,但是忽视了它所具有的表达复杂历史情势的意义。中国当代文论对“接合”理论的接受,既要回到具体历史语境深入把握霍尔的“接合”理论的复杂意义,又要重视不断建立的新接合及其所表达的真正历史情势。

关键词:

Abstract:

Over the past two decades, Stuart Hall’s theory of articulation has been received and studied by Chinese academia, gradually evolving from a key concept in cultural studies to one in cultural criticism. Initially rendered into Chinese through various translations, the term has since stabilized as“接 合 ,”with growing emphasis on its connotations of connection and combination. Hall’s early thinking was influenced by Louis Althusser, which led him to explore the complex articulations between, on the one hand, Marx’s theory of production and theoretical reflection, and, on the other, historical reality and historical materialism. By the late 1970s, drawing on Antonio Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, Hall argued that language achieves articulation with the external world through conflicts and struggles over meaning—thereby not only assigning meaning to the world but also constructing and expressing specific historical conditions. In the new century, contemporary Chinese literary theory applied articulation to cultural criticism, regarding it as a potential means of dynamically linking theory and reality; yet this application tended to overlook the theory’s capacity to represent complex historical conditions. Thus, the reception of articulation in Chinese literary theory should not only return to its specific historical context to grasp the theory’s complexities, but also emphasize the ongoing formation of new articulations and the authentic historical conditions they express.

Key words:

中图分类号: