上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 79-90.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

人工智能的艺术创作可能吗?

  

  1. 上海社会科学院 哲学研究所
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-13 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-11-09
  • 作者简介:周丰(1989- ),男,安徽固镇人。上海社会科学院哲学研究所助理研究员。研究方向:神 经美学、人工智能艺术哲学。

Can AI Create Arts ?

  1. Institute of Philosophy, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences
  • Received:2021-10-13 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-11-09

摘要: 人工智能与人脑的差异意味着人工智能主体性的缺失:计算的本质和机械的一级 同构信息处理方式意味着人工智能只有一个信息输出端口,而人类的信息加工却同时具有机 体端口和意识端口的输出,且两者具有原型同构关系。意识端口是与机体端口相伴随的认识 或评价,指向自我。人工智能计算的本质决定了其艺术创作是机械的。因此,从传统的艺术 本质论来看,人工智能的作品并不是艺术;但从艺术体制论来看,它又可成为艺术。然而,这 种表达的主体并非人工智能,而是它背后的推动者。从这个意义上说,人工智能只是媒介。 人工智能可以作为一种技术媒介表达主体性,但这需要人工智能正视主体性问题,才能发挥 作为媒介的长处从而进行艺术创新。

关键词: 人工智能, 艺术创作, 机械性, 主体性, 媒介

Abstract: The differences between AI and human brain determines AI’s lack of subjectivity: the nature of computation and the first-order isomorphic information processing of machines means that in information processing, AI has only one information output port, but humans have both body and consciousness output ports, which are in proto-isomorphic relationship. Consciousness port is self-oriented and generating cognition or evaluation by working together with the body port. This is exactly what AI is missing. The nature of AI computation defines the mechanical nature of its art creation: the lack of knowledge or expressions of its own determines its absence of subjectivity. Therefore, AI works are not arts if judged from the traditional perspective of the art essence theory, but from the perspective of art system theory, they can create arts although the subject of its expressions is not AI, but the human operator behind it. In this sense, AI can only be a medium. It is possible that AI expresses subjectivity, but only under the prerequisite that we face up to AI’s predicaments of subjectivity so as to give full play to its advantages and artistic innovation as a medium.

Key words: artificial intelligence (AI), art creation, mechanical nature, subjectivity, medium

中图分类号: