上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 51-62.

• 影视理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

哪种电影,谁的理论?——比较电影学与电影理论的迷踪

  

  1. 四川师范大学 影视与传媒学院
  • 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2022-11-28

Which Type of Film? Whose Theory?—Comparative Filmology and the Myth of Film Theories

  • Online:2022-09-15 Published:2022-11-28

摘要: 艺术作品的美学自主性生成于复制、挪用和循环的过程中,这导致任何一部影片的关联作品清单都难以穷尽。电影理论企图通过概念创造进行风格提纯,以确认影片的个性和原创身份。但由于理论本身的社交性质和折中色彩,概念的共存、流动和滥用现象十分普遍。在理论和历史的夹缝里,概念成了一个空洞的幽灵。在破译电影理论身份的世界难题中,比较电影学可以成为一种基本策略。无论顺序比较主义还是语境比较主义,比较电影研究的目的都不是将肤浅的异同比较作为理论原创身份的注释,而是以知识生产的语言竞争和符号转换为思维,重视理论旅行中的本源差异,尝试在一个开放性视野中找到不同电影理论的思想之源。

关键词: 比较电影学, 民族电影理论, 顺序比较主义, 语境比较主义

Abstract: The aesthetic autonomy of artistic works is generated in the process of copying, misappropriating and circulating, which makes it difficult to exhaust the list of related works of any film. A film theory attempts to create concepts to abstract a more purified style so as to confirm its individuality and originality. However, due to the social and eclectic nature of theories themselves, the coexistence, flow and abuse of concepts are very common. In the crevice between theory and history, concept becomes an empty ghost. Comparative filmology can be a basic strategy to solve the worldwide problem of deciphering the theoretical identity of a film. Be it sequential comparatism or contextual comparatism, the purpose of comparative film research is not to take superficial similarities and differences as the annotation of original theoretical identity, but to attach importance to the essential differences in theoretical origins by regarding language competition and semiotic transformation aiming at knowledge production as ways of  thinking,  and to find the ideological sources of different film theories in an open perspective.

Key words: comparative filmology, ethnic film theory, sequential comparatism, contextual , comparatism