上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 115-127.

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

西美尔“货币”哲学话语的现代遗产及其思想史效应 ——基于马克思文本的互文性分析

  

  1. 安徽大学 马克思主义学院
  • 出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-03-18

The Modern Legacy of the Discourse of Simmel’s Philosophy of “Money”and Its Significance in the History of Thought—Based on Intertextuality Analysis of Marx’s Texts 

  • Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-03-18

摘要:  货币,作为中介和符号,是理解现代社会的重要枢纽。在马克思政治经济学批判当代性研究中,阐释马克思货币哲学,引入西美尔视角十分重要。以往研究常忽视西美尔的货币哲学的内在维度,也缺乏其对西方马克思主义的思想史效应的考察。马克思的货币哲学是一种基于对货币、所有制、生产方式等结构关系的阐释而形成的唯物史观及其批判理论范式。比较之下,西美尔对货币的分析更多是基于心理体验和互动交换关系的文化社会理论范式。西美尔理论是对马克思宏观结构分析的补充和拓展,并直接影响到卢卡奇对马克思哲学的阐释路向。这为卢卡奇思想来源提供了一种新的证据,西美尔货币哲学话语具有重要的思想史内涵,对当代中国的社会建设也有启迪。

关键词: 关键词: 西美尔, 马克思, 货币, 现代遗产, 互文性分析, 思想史效应

Abstract: Money, an intermediary and symbol, is an important approach to understanding modern society. In the contemporary study of Marx’s critique of political economy, it is very important to introduce Simmel’s perspective to explain Marx’s monetary philosophy. However, the internal dimension of Simmel’s philosophy of money is often neglected in the past studies together with its effect on ideological history of Western Marxism. Marx’s philosophy of money is a materialist historical interpretation of the structural relations of money, ownership and modes of production within a critical theoretical paradigm. Comparatively speaking, Simmel’s analysis of money is more based on psychological experience and interactive exchange relations within a cultural and social theoretical paradigm. Simmel’s theory is a supplement to and an extension of Marx’s macro structure analysis and directly affects Lukacs’ interpretation of Marx’s philosophy. This provides new evidence for Lukacs’ source of thought, which is significant in the history of thought and enlightening to China’s current social construction .

Key words: Key words: Simmel, Marx, money, modern heritage, intertextuality analysis, significance in the history of thought