上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 122-140.

• 政治学研究 • 上一篇    

重新认识政治态度——基于西方研究的梳理与反思

  

  1. 山西大学政治与公共管理学院
  • 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2021-07-02

  • Online:2020-11-15 Published:2021-07-02

摘要: 政治态度历来是政治心理学学科体系中的重要主题之一,也是现实政治世界中民众最为日常的政治表达。正因如此,人们对于政治态度的认识带有“熟悉的漠视”,所以迫切需要正本清源,重新认识政治态度。通过对西方近百年政治态度研究历史的爬梳,可发现其研究主要围绕政治态度的内涵,政治态度的成分、结构与属性,政治态度的测量,政治态度的影响因素及其形成与转变等五大方面展开,在产生相当多研究成果的基础上,也存在诸多难以调和的争议与迷思,使得政治态度研究陷入工具性、微观化和过度科学化的泥沼,难以形成有力的研究范式。基于这样的反思,应以清晰界定政治态度概念、结构与独特属性为基础,采用混合与多元的研究方法探究政治态度形成与转变的制度缘由与体系根源,进而展现政治态度的独有面貌与深层机理。
关键词: 政治态度;西方政治态度研究;政治心理学

关键词: 政治态度, 西方政治态度研究, 政治心理学

Abstract:  As one of the long-standing and important topics in political psychology, political attitude has also been most frequently reflected in ordinary people’s daily life. However, studies of political attitude have long been below the radar of most researchers simply because of their closeness to daily life, thus calling for historical reexamination. A review of the century-long history of political attitude studies in the West reveals five outstanding topics in the previous studies, namely, connotations, components, structure and properties, measurement, influencing factors and evolution. Having yielded a considerable amount of outputs though, political attitude studies face a myriad of hard-to-resolve disputes and controversies. Lack of a defining paradigm, political attitude studies can hardly free themselves from the traps of “instrumentality”, “micro-level mentality” and “over-scientification”. In view of this, it is necessary to define clear connotations and the unique properties of political attitudes, and examine the institutional origins of the formation and transformation of political attitudes by employing some hybrid methodologies. By so doing, researchers will be in a better position to present the idiosyncratic properties of political attitudes and the underling mechanisms behind them.

Key words: political attitudes, western studies of political attitude, political psychology