上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 115-131.

• 社会学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“本土化热”背景下的社会学理论观:学理探讨、建构困境和方法图景#br#

  

  1. 南京大学 社会学院
  • 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2020-11-27

heoretical Views of Sociology in the Context of “Localization Fever”: #br# Academic Discussions, Construction Dilemmas and Methodological Perspectives#br#

  • Online:2020-07-15 Published:2020-11-27

摘要: “本土化”之所以掀起伪命题之争,是因为该议题同时涉及了理论和西方知识,两者在不经意间被混为一谈。在澄清两者区别的基础上,理论的特点揭示了因其界定标准而导致的中国学界建构理论的外在困境,也即话语权的归属;同时,现实环境中的分工化、细粒化、计量化和实用化构成了中国学界建构理论的内在实践困境。即便如此,鉴于中国本土的条件以及实践的潜在可能性,建构的途径主要有输入学理、整理国故、现实抽象和全球视角。总之,就中国目前的学术环境而言,尽管理论建构仍然存在不小的困境,但是对于理论观的探讨不失为一种有价值的参考。

关键词: 社会学理论; 西方知识; 知识人; 建构困境;  , 方法图景

Abstract: The reason why “localization” provoked the discussions about the pseudoproposition is that the issue involves both theory and western knowledge, which are confused unconsciously. On the basis of clarifying the two, theoretical characteristics reveal that the external dilemmas faced by Chinese academicians in theoretical construction are caused by the confusion in defining theoretical standards, a problem concerning the final discourse power. At the meantime, labor division, finegraining, computerization and practicability constitute the internal dilemmas. Even so, given China’s advantageous conditions for localization and feasibility in practice, the methods of theoretical construction mainly include introducing western theories, invigorating Chinese classics, abstracting from reality and holding a global perspective. In short, despite the great difficulties faced by China in theoretical construction under the current circumstances, the analysis of theoretical views is, after all, necessary and meaningful.

Key words: socioligical theory, western knowledge, the Man of Knowledge, dilemmas of construction, methodological perspectives