上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 16-26.

• 中国问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于功能性视角的人工智能法律人格再审视#br#

  

  1. 中山大学 法学院
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-11 出版日期:2020-01-15 发布日期:2020-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 袁曾(1988),男,湖北孝感人。中山大学法学院/南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海)兼职研究人员,上海交通大学凯原法学院在站博士后研究人员,法学博士。主要研究方向为:民商法、海商法。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA145);2019年上海交通大学凯原法学院前沿交叉基金项目(WF118119003/001/042);中国博士后科学基金资助项目

Revisiting the Legal Personality of AI from the Functional Perspective

  • Received:2018-10-11 Online:2020-01-15 Published:2020-03-10

摘要: 人工智能的规模化应用已触发侵权责任承担、权利能力确定、知识产权归属等关键性法律问题,必须通过明确人工智能是否具有法律人格、具有什么样的法律人格以回应上述现实矛盾。现有关于人工智能法律人格存在否定说、肯定说、有限说等多种学说,其法律地位完成证否或证成均不符合现实需要,应采取折中的法律人格有限说。考察法律人格扩张的历史进路与拟制法人的形成过程,可以明确:法律人格的确认是法律为了解决现实需要而做出的功能性安排。从解决实际问题出发,承认人工智能法律人格的有限性并明确“穿透人工智能面纱”的首要归责原则,通过法律系统性调整实现人工智能技术与社会正向发展目标。
关键词:

关键词:  , 人工智能, 法律人格, 智能合约, 法律工程

Abstract:  Largescale application of artificial intelligence (AI) has triggered some critical legal issues like the assumption of tort liability, the determination of rights and abilities and the ownership of intellectual property rights. To solve these problems, we must first of all clarify whether artificial intelligence has legal personality and what kind of legal personality it has. As to whether AI has legal personality, current theories have offered various answers including denial, affirmation and limited affirmation. Since absolute answers of yes or no to the legal status of AI do not meet the actual needs, a compromise theory of limited legal personality should be adopted. A study of the historical course of how the connotation of legal personality has gradually expanded and how the proposed AI legal personality came into being is functionally necessary to meet the actual needs. Starting from solving practical problems, we should acknowledge the limited legal personality of AI and establish a doctrine of primary liability that can unveil the mysteries of AI liability so as to realize the positive goal of AI technologies facilitating social development through the adjustment of legal system. 

Key words:  , artificial intelligence, legal personality, AI contracts, legal project