上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 35-44.

• 中国古典研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中唐韩柳古文书写的可能与规则及其限度 ——以语体为视角 (1.

  

  1. 上海交通大学人文学院
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-18 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-05-15

Possibility,Rules and Limits of Han Yu and Liu Zongyuan's Prose Writing in MidTang Dynasty: A Stylistic Perspective

  • Received:2018-11-18 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-15

摘要: “古文”并非一种相对于骈文或其他时文的文体概念,“古”乃是语体“古雅”或“雅正”的标识。“古文”书写的可能,一在形式上的复古,以求“古雅”;一在主题上的“明道”,以求“雅正”。“古文”书写有其规则,书写者须明了上古汉语与中世汉语的区别,并遵守上古汉语的韵律与语法规则。由于“古文”书写者难以突破身处的思想学术传统与社会习俗的制约,故只能在部分文体上求得突破,而难以真正挑战时文的地位与影响。

关键词: 韩柳, 语体, 古文, 规则, 骈文

Abstract: Ancient Chinese prose is not a stylistic concept like parallel prose or other popular essays. “Ancient”, equivalent to Chinese character gu, signifies classic elegance and standard correction. The purposes of ancient Chinese prose writing in Tang Dynasty contained the quest for elegant form by returning to the ancients on the one hand and standard correction by revealing truth thematically on the other hand. However, ancient Chinese prose had its own writing rules and principles, so writers in MidTang Dynasty were required not only to understand the differences between palaeoid Chinese and medieval Chinese, but also to obey the rules of pronunciation and grammar in palaeoid Chinese. Since writers failed to get away from the restrictions of their current ideologicalacademic traditions and social customs, they could only achieve breakthroughs in some styles but not all, thus hardly managing to challenge the popular essay styles of the times.

Key words: ancient Chinese prose, style, Han and Liu, parallel prose, rules