上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 41-59.

• 中国问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

“一带一路”战略下我国开展国际民商事司法协助的法律思考

  

  1. 上海对外经贸大学 法学院
  • 出版日期:2017-05-15 发布日期:2017-05-15

Legal Thinking on China’s Judicial Assistance in International Civil and Commercial Affairs in the Perspective of the Belt and Road Initiative

  • Online:2017-05-15 Published:2017-05-15

摘要:

“一带一路”战略是我国应对全球形势深刻变化、统筹国际国内两个大局作出的具有划时代意义的重大战略决策,不仅是我国实施“走出去”对外经济战略发展的必然,更彰显了我国日益增强的国际影响力和承担更多国际责任的大国风范。共建“一带一路”,亟待我国有效开展国际民商事司法协助。目前,我国适用的实际联系原则过于狭隘,规定的专属管辖权范围较为宽泛,在解决平行诉讼问题上过分偏袒本国当事人,长期以来形成的“事实互惠”以及现行双边司法协助条约显然已不能满足现实的需要。为此,结合当前“一带一路”之战略背景及现行立法与司法保障的现状,我国应优化完善相关司法制度,树立大国司法理念,主动淡化司法主权观念,缩小专属管辖范围等;同时,借鉴吸收国内外的先进做法,树立开放性思维和全球性战略,重视参与并推动国际规则的制定,夯实“一带一路”的国际政治基础,努力提升我国司法的国际影响力和公信力。
 

关键词: 一带一路, 司法保障, 外国民商事判决, 承认与执行

Abstract:

 China’sBelt and Road Initiative is an epochmaking strategy in response to profound global changes,aiming at coordinating the international and domestic situation. As an inevitable result of “going out” economic strategy, the initiative also demonstrates China's growing international influence and willingness to bear more international responsibility as a great nation. The cobuilding of the Initiative requires China to efficiently conduct judicial assistance in international civil and commercial affairs. At present, the principle of substantial connection in China is too narrow; the scope of exclusive jurisdiction is relatively broad; it is partial to our own partieswhen dealing with parallel proceedings; the longestablished “factual reciprocity” and existing bilateral judicial assistance treaties have obviously failed to meet practical needs.Therefore, given the background of the Belt and Road Initiative and the reality of China’s present legislative and judicial safeguard, China should optimize and perfect relevant judicial system, establish judicial concepts in accordance with a great nation,actively dilute the concept of judicial sovereignty and reduce the scope of exclusive jurisdiction. Meanwhile, China should draw lessons from the advanced practices at home and broad, establish a global strategy with open mind, value the participation in making international rules and consolidate the international political basis of the Initiative so as to elevate the international influence and public trust of China’s judicature.
 

Key words: Belt and Road Initiative, judicial guarantee, recognition and enforcement, judgment in foreign civil and commercial affairs