上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 73-86.

• 中国古典研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

由《左传》看《老子》所述大小国关系#br# 的年代学特征

  

  1. 上海大学文学院
  • 出版日期:2017-03-15 发布日期:2017-03-15

Viewing the Chronological Features of the Relations between Big and #br# Small States Described in Lao Zi in the Perspective of Zuo Zhuan

  • Online:2017-03-15 Published:2017-03-15

摘要:

 从《左传》所述春秋史实看,其时大小国之间的力量对比尚未失衡,大国对小国犹有忌惮。更重要的是,春秋时周礼犹有浓厚影响,这对霸主的强权构成有力制约。由于这两方面的原因,春秋时的大小国有双向的责任和义务:大国对小国要扶危济困,小国对大国也要克敬职贡,这正是《老子》所述大小国关系的时代背景。相反,战国之世捐礼义而任诈伪,以攻伐为贤,大小国的力量对比已严重失衡。所以,《老子》对大小国相处原则的这种设计只可能出现于春秋时代,而绝不可能是战国之世。

关键词: 《老子》, 小国, 周礼, 大国

Abstract:

 Viewing the history of Spring and Autumn Period in the perspective of Zuo Zhuan, we find that the power between big and small states was yet to lose balance with big states still scrupulous towards small ones. More importantly, the rites of Zhou was still prevalent in Spring and Autumn period, exerting strong restraint on the hegemony of a powerful chief of princes. Due to these two reasons, the big and small states in Spring and Autumn Period had mutual responsibilities and obligations: big states were obliged to help the small ones out of danger or poverty, while small ones showed loyalty and paid articles of tribute. The setting conformed with the state relations between big and small ones depicted in Lao Zi. While in Warring States Period, rites and righteousness were sacrificed for cheating and fraud, and invasion and aggression was upheld, thus leading to the wide power disparity between big and small states. In this regard, the gettingalong principle designed for the big and small states in Lao Zi could only exist in the Spring and Autumn Period rather than in the Warring States Period.

Key words: big states, small states, rites of Zhou, Lao Zi