上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1-8.

• 中国问题 •    下一篇

论“五大理念”的思想解放力

  

  1. 上海大学社会学院
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-20 出版日期:2016-09-15 发布日期:2016-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 上海大学社会学院终身教授,中国社会学会顾问

On the Capacity of “Five Development Concepts” to #br# Emancipate the Mind

  • Received:2016-05-20 Online:2016-09-15 Published:2016-09-15

摘要:

“创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享”五大发展理念是辩证的统一,是“你中有我,我中有你”的、内在联系极为密切的集合体。“绿色”反映了人类社会存在与发展的历史必然。人类独有的社会性决定了要把“共享”作为目标。变平、变小了的“地球村”要求扩大“开放”度。“协调”和“创新”贯穿于“绿色、共享、开放”之中。新发展的“五大理念”在转化为物质力量的过程中将会不断丰富和提升我们对其的认识。在把新发展理念转化为物质力量的起点上,尤其需要放眼量,不能贪图眼前的蝇头小利。开放取决于思想的解放,胸怀的豪放,热情的奔放。“创新是动力”,创新自身也需要动力。这动力就是不拘一格,就是百花齐放,就是彩虹般的“赤橙黄绿青蓝紫”。因此,我们应当努力建设一个与绿色自然生态相对应的“宜创”的“彩虹学术生态”。为了做到共享必须坚决摒弃“效率优先,兼顾公平”的错误理念。“兼顾公平”论是作为“原则”来推行的,对原则错误要作为原则来纠正。建议大大方方、堂堂正正地公开批评“兼顾公平”论。为了协调,要大力发展社会组织。社会组织是政府与民众间的枢纽,是民主的DNA;社会组织是化解社会矛盾的调节器;社会组织的数量、结构、质量是衡量社会文明的标尺。害怕社会组织是缺乏制度自信的表现。

关键词:  , 发展理念, 社会组织, 社会发展, 彩虹学术生态

Abstract:

 Five Development Concepts, namely, “innovation, coordination, green development, opening up, and sharing”, are dialectically unified, inseparable and inherently linked with one another as a whole collection. “Green development” reflects the historical inevitability of human social existence and development. The sociality unique in mankind determines that “sharing” should be set as the goal. A flatter and smaller “global village” calls for increasing “opening up”. “Coordination” and “innovation” run through “green development, sharing and opening up”. The newly developed “Five Concepts” will constantly enrich and elevate our understanding of the concepts in transforming into material forces. At the onset of the transformation, we should look far ahead without coveting temporary petty profits. Opening up depends on the emancipated mind, unconstrained generosity and compassionate enthusiasm. Innovation is a driving force and needs a driving force, too. The driving force should be free from any set patterns, like a hundred flowers in bloom, like a rainbow imbued with each shade of color. Therefore, we should strive for a congenial “rainbow academic ecology”, equivalent to the green natural ecology. In order to achieve sharing, we must resolutely abandon the mistaken concept of “efficiency first while giving consideration to fairness”. As “giving consideration to fairness” is advocated as a principle, a mistaken principle should be corrected as a principle. The principle of “giving consideration to fairness” should be criticized frankly, fairly and openly. In order to achieve coordination, we should vigorously develop social organizations, which serve as a bridge between the governments and the public and as the DNA of democracy. Social organizations are regulators that can solve social contradictions. The number, structure and quality of social organizations can be taken as the gauge of social civilization. The fear of social organizations is a symptom of lacking institutional confidence.
Key words:

Key words: development concepts, rainbow academic ecology,  social development, social organizations