上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 105-113.

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家安全视野下环境犯罪治理途径探寻

  

  1. 河南科技大学 法学院
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-27 出版日期:2016-01-15 发布日期:2016-01-15

 Channels of Controlling Environmental Crimes in the Perspective of State Security

  • Received:2015-05-27 Online:2016-01-15 Published:2016-01-15

摘要:  生态安全是国家安全的重要组成部分,国家安全视野下,环境犯罪的治理依赖于国际与国内两个途径。国际合作方面,充分利用国际刑警组织平台,实现环境犯罪资料互通与追捕、通缉、引渡上的通力合作;实现国家间刑事司法协助的全方位与有效性,排除国家之间在打击国际环境犯罪上的障碍;加快加入国际刑事法院规约的步伐,以争取拥有更多话语权。国内法方面,构建以生态法益为中心的环境刑法体例,实现环境刑法的独立;秉行重刑主义原则,兼顾惩罚犯罪与恢复环境二元化功能,充分发挥刑罚的多重作用;运用疫学因果关系证明方法以及过错推定规则,走出环境犯罪司法认定上的困境。
关键词:

关键词:  生态安全, 环境犯罪, 国际合作, 二元处罚体系, 认定规则

Abstract:  Ecological security is an important part of national security, from the perspective of which environmental crimes are controlled through both international and domestic channels. Concerning international cooperation, we should make full use of the International Criminal Police Organization platform through the share of the data of environmental crimes and realize vigorous cooperation in tracing, arresting, and extradition; strive for allround and efficient criminal judicial assistance among different nations and remove the statetostate obstacles in combating international environmental crimes; accelerate the pace of entering statute of the International Criminal Court so as to gain more discourse power. Domestically, we should construct the environmental criminal law system centering on ecological law and realize the independence of the environmental criminal law; adopt the doctrine of severe punishment while giving full play to dualistic function of the crime punishment and environmental recovery and the multiple function of penalty; employ the method of causal relation of epidemic disease and presumptivefault rules to get out of the predicament of the environmental crime judicial cognizance.

Key words:  ecological security, environmental crime, international cooperation, dualistic penalty system, principles of cognizance