English

上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 124-132.

• 公共管理学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多元主体评估模式：重大决策社会稳定风险评估机制的发展方向

  

  1. 淮阴师范学院政治与公共管理学院,江苏 淮安 223300;
    北京师范大学政府管理学院，北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2014-11-15 发布日期:2014-11-15
  • 作者简介:张玉磊（1982），男，河南新乡人。淮阴师范学院政治与公共管理学院讲师，北京师范大学政府管理学院博士研究生，淮安市政和社会稳定风险评估中心办公室主任，主要从事社会管理、社会稳定风险评估研究
  • 基金资助:

     国家社会科学基金重大项目（13&ZD039）；国家社会科学基金重点项目（12AGL007）；淮阴师范学院青年优秀人才支持计划（11HSQNS11）

Multisubject Assessment Model: Development of Major Policy Social Stability Risk Assessment Mechanism

  1. Politics and Public Management School, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai’an, Jiangsu 223300;
    School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2014-11-15 Published:2014-11-15

摘要： 健全重大决策社会稳定风险评估机制是推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要内容，而由政府、利益相关者和第三方等主体构成的多元主体评估模式是重大决策社会稳定风险评估机制必须坚持的发展方向，它对增强稳评主体的独立性、实现稳评过程的民主化、提高稳评结果的科学性具有重大意义。然而，建立重大决策社会稳定风险评估机制多元主体评估模式在实践中还面临着政府自闭性与其他主体稳评意识不强、多元主体稳评能力不足、制度保障缺乏等现实障碍。通过重塑政府治理理念和强化其他主体的稳评意识、提高多元主体参与稳评的能力、健全多元主体参与稳评的制度体系，可以有效构建重大决策社会稳定风险评估机制多元主体评估模式。

关键词:  , 政府管理；公共政策；公共管理；重大决策；社会稳定；风险评估；多元主体评估模式

Abstract:  Perfecting major policy social stability risk assessment mechanism is an important link in modernizing state governance and the governance system. The multisubject assessment model involves three parties, namely, the government, the interestrelated party, and the third party. It is the choice for major policy social stability risk assessment because it can strengthen the subjects’ independence and ensure democracy of the process and reliability of the result. However, to establish a multisubject assessment model for major policy social stability risk assessment, we have to first confront a number of challenges, including the autistic tendency of the government, the lack of awareness in stability risk assessment among other parties, incapacity of the parties to conduct the assessment, and the absence of system guarantee. The multisubject assessment model can be more effectively developed through reshaping the conception of government governance, strengthening the consciousness of assessment among the other subjects, improving the assessment competence of various parties, and perfecting the system of assessment.

Key words: state governance, public policy, public management, majon policy, social stability, risk assessment, multisubjects assessment model

中图分类号: