上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

网络著作权犯罪的实证分析与司法应对——基于100个网络著作权犯罪案件的分析

  

  1. 浙江理工大学 法政学院
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-12 出版日期:2014-03-15 发布日期:2014-03-15
  • 基金资助:

     教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(12JZD039)

Online Copyright Infringement: An Empirical Analysis and Judicial Response——An analysis based on 100 online copyright infringement cases

  • Received:2013-11-12 Online:2014-03-15 Published:2014-03-15

摘要: 基于对100个网络著作权犯罪案例样本的分析,在政策和法律双重因素的影响下,我国对网络著作权犯罪惩治力度不断强化。司法实践中涉及的著作权类型多元化,重视共同实行犯罪的处罚,“以营利为目的”认定问题不再突出,重视罚金刑的适用,同时坚持刑罚轻缓化。但是也暴露出忽视单位犯罪,极少处罚帮助犯,漠视移动网络中的犯罪等问题。在此基础上应当反思解决我国著作权刑法保护领域中存在的“运动式司法”和“选择性司法”现象,并提出在整体策略上应当坚持立法的“积极作为”和司法的“持重平衡”之道。

关键词:  , 网络犯罪, 侵害著作权罪, 实证, 司法策略

Abstract:  An analysis of the 100 online copyright infringement cases reveals that China has steadily intensified punishment on criminal copyright infringements by means of both policy making and legal mechanisms. As demonstrated by these cases, such infringements are diversified. In the judicial practice, emphasis is laid on punishing crime jointly; it is no longer a technical problem to determine whether the use made of a work in any particular case is for commercial purpose; fines are more readily applicable for these infringements; efforts have been made to mitigate punishment. The analysis also shows that there are a number of issues to be addressed. For example, crimes committed by a unit are sometimes overlooked; accessories are seldom punished; and crimes committed in the mobile network largely go unpunished. The paper suggests that efforts should be made to discourage the“campaignstyle justice”and“selective justice”in China’s legal protection of copyright and it also proposes an overall strategy of“positive action”in legislation and“prudent balance”in the judiciary.

Key words:  Internet crime, Online Copyright Infringement, empirical, judicial strategy