English

上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 32-41.

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

罪刑法定主义派生原则的功能廓清

  

  1. （浙江省高级人民法院，浙江 杭州 310012）
  • 出版日期:2010-03-15 发布日期:2010-03-15

The Functional Clearness in Derived Principles for
Conviction and Penalty According to Law

  • Online:2010-03-15 Published:2010-03-15

被引次数

6

摘要：



　　摘要：  时至今日，罪刑法定原则已经从绝对转向相对、从理论原则转向司法原则。这一转变体现了有利于被告人的精神，进一步增加了该原则的出罪功能。与之相适应，罪刑法定派生原则的功能也应随之转变。首先，不应一概排斥习惯法；鉴于习惯法出罪去刑功能上的特性，还应当将习惯法纳入刑法渊源之列。其次，类推解释也不应一概禁止，有利于被告人的类推解释应当允许；同样，在扩张解释与限制解释上也应作有利于和不利于被告人之分，并区别对待。最后，在刑法解释的溯及力问题上，不应一律赋予其溯及力，并且应当禁止不利于被告人的刑法解释溯及既往。

 

关键词: 关键词： 罪刑法定； 派生原则；习惯法； 刑法解释； 溯及力

Abstract:

The Functional Clearness in Derived Principles for
Conviction and Penalty According to Law(Zhejiang Higher People' s Court, Hangzhou, 310012, China)Abstract： Up to today, the principle for conviction and penalty according to law has changed from absolute to relative, and from formal to substantial. This transformation displays the spirit beneficial to the accused person, and thus further increases its noncrime function. Correspondingly, the function of the derived principle for conviction and penalty according to law should also be transformed. First, the custom law should not blindly be excluded and its noncrime function should be integrated into the origin of the criminal law. Secondly, the analogy explanation should also not blindly be forbidden, and the analogy explanation beneficial to the defendant should be permitted. And at the same time, for the dilative explanation and the restrictive explanation, whether beneficial or harmful to the defendant, should be determined. Finally, in criminal law interpretations, the retroactivity should not be given all and singular. The retroactivity in criminal explorations harmful to the defendant should be prohibited.

　

Key words: Key words： conviction and penalty according to law; derived principle; custom law; criminal explanation; retroactivity

中图分类号: