上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 88-98.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

双重范式转向:气氛美学的批判潜能

  

  1. 广西师范大学 文学院
  • 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-08-03
  • 作者简介:
    麦永雄,广西师范大学文学院教授、博士生导师,中国语言文学研究所所长,桂学研究院研究员。研究方向:当代哲学与美学、比较诗学与世界文学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目(25AWW007)

The Dual Paradigm Shift:The Critical Potential of Atmospheric Aesthetics

  1. College of Liberal Arts, Guangxi Normal University
  • Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-08-03

摘要:

在当代西方文艺美学领域,近年来有两种理论范式转向引人瞩目,两者之间关系密切,且产生了国际性影响:一是气氛转向,二是情动转向。不少学者注意到气氛美学的批判性问题,甚至将气氛转向视为情动转向的有机组成部分。由此“气氛-情动”构成了双重范式转向的问题框架:气氛转向催生了以德国学者波默与意大利学者格里夫罗为代表的气氛美学,而情动转向所驱动的情动研究则被美国著名文艺理论家里奇视为 21世纪文论的前沿论域。气氛美学强调主客间性和身体性在场,重视情动的场景化效应,蕴含了一种绵里藏针的批判潜能。这种双范式转向强调气氛-情动的辩证关系,蕴含着跨越既有边界、开辟创新空间的间性美学特质,在批判潜能维度凸显出三大向度:对西方主流美学“判断美学”的批判;审美政治与法西斯主义美学批判;审美经济与数字媒介批判。

关键词:

Abstract:

In the field of contemporary Western literary and artistic aesthetics, two closely related theoretical paradigm shifts with international impact have drawn significant attention in recent years: the atmospheric turn and the affective turn. Many scholars have noted the critical importance of atmospheric aesthetics, even regarding the atmospheric turn as an integral part of the affective turn. Thus, the“atmosphereaffect”nexus constitutes the problematic of this dual-paradigm shift: the atmospheric turn has given rise to atmospheric aesthetics, represented by German scholar Gernot Böhme and Italian scholar Tonino Griffero, while affect studies, driven by the affective turn, have been regarded by renowned American literary theorist V. B. Leitch as a frontier domain of 21st-century literary theory. Atmospheric aesthetics emphasizes intersubjectivity and bodily presence, attaches importance to scenario-driven affect, and contains an understated critical potential. This dual-paradigm shift highlights the dialectical relationship between atmosphere and affect, possessing interstitial aesthetic characteristics that transcend existing boundaries and open up innovative spaces. In terms of its critical potential, it reveals three main orientations: the critique of the“aesthetics of judgment”prevalent in mainstream Western aesthetics; the critique of aesthetic politics and fascist aesthetics;and the critique of the aesthetic economy and digital media.

Key words:

中图分类号: