上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 1-14.

• •    下一篇

论数字伦理的法律之治

  

  1. 上海交通大学 凯原法学院
  • 出版日期:2026-01-15 发布日期:2026-02-12
  • 作者简介:彭诚信,上海交通大学凯原法学院教授,法学博士。研究方向:民法基本理论、数字法学。
  • 基金资助:

    上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2023BZZ001);

    国家社会科学基金重大项目(24&ZD131);

    国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目(23AFX014)

On the Legal Governance of Digital Ethics

  1. KoGuan School of Law, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Online:2026-01-15 Published:2026-02-12

摘要: 线下社会与数字社会的基本价值取向具有一致性,数字社会中的伦理风险在根本上是因违背尊重人格平等与自由的普适性伦理所致。若忽视基本伦理的指导作用,数字法学将缺乏正当性根基;若无法律制度的保障,数字伦理也无法得到落实。基于人格与财产的不可通约性,个人信息财产价值如何正当外化构成数据确权的前提。在此前提下,数据不能迷信事前明确权利归属的理想状态,应以尊重数据处理者劳动贡献,提升数据利用效率,兼顾数据利益分配正义为综合考量,建立更加精细的数据确权制度。为规制数字技术应用的风险,应将“向善”纳入立法目的,确保数字技术应用的手段“可信”,即开发者或应用者对算法及可能对相关主体权益造成的影响进行公开并作出解释。数字社会伦理依然以自然人类为根基,数字伦理的法律之治则在于培育人的趋善能力。

关键词: 数字伦理, 数字法理, 数据确权, 数字技术应用

Abstract: The fundamental values of offline and digital societies are aligned. Ethical risks in the digital society ultimately stem from the violation of universal ethics that respect equality and freedom of personality. If the guiding role of basic ethics is neglected, digital jurisprudence will lack a legitimate foundation; without the safeguard of legal institutions, digital ethics cannot be effectively implemented. Based on the incommensurability of personality and property, the legitimate externalization of the property value of personal information constitutes the premise of data rights determination. Under this premise, data rights should not blindly adhere to the ideal state of predetermined ownership. Instead, a system should be established that comprehensively considers respecting the labor contributions of data processors, improving data utilization efficiency, and balancing justice in data benefit distribution, thereby establishing a more refined system for data rights determination. To regulate the risks associated with digital technology applications, “beneficence”should be incorporated into legislative purposes, along with ensuring that the means of applying digital technologies are “trustworthy.”This means developers or applicators must disclose and explain their algorithms and potential impacts on the rights and interests of relevant subjects. The essence of digital social ethics ultimately lies in natural humanity, and the rule of law in digital ethics aims to cultivate humanity’s capacity for the pursuit of the good.

Key words: digital ethics, digital jurisprudence, data rights determination, digital technology application

中图分类号: