English

上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 105-119.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

乡村政策信息传递何以形成共识？——基于上海市L村相对集中居住治理实践的调查

  

  1. 李 峰：华东政法大学 社会发展学院

    韩 冰：华东政法大学 政府管理学院

  • 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-09-29
  • 作者简介:
    李峰，华东政法大学社会发展学院教授、博士生导师。研究方向：社会治理。
    韩冰，华东政法大学政府管理学院博士研究生。研究方向：乡村社会治理。（通信作者）

How Does Rural Policy Communication Generate Consensus？—A Case Study of Centralized Residential Governance in L Village,
Shanghai

  1. LI Feng： School of Social Development, East China University of Political Science and Law
     HAN Bing：School of Government, East China University of Political Science and Law
  • Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-29

摘要：

从共同生产理论出发，基于上海市 L村农民相对集中居住治理实践展开的实证研 究发现：政策信息传递是共同生产的过程，但制度环境、社会环境与民众个人特征交织造成的 “信息噪声”引发政策传递阻滞，“噪声”成为摩擦表征。在此意义上，基层政策执行者的工作 就是“去噪”过程，利用政策话语、经验话语与情感话语整合政策文本资源、地方性知识资源与
人际互动情感资源，从而达成共识。该研究将共同生产理论从公共服务领域延伸至政策过程场景，揭示出信息传递的双向建构性，对促进治理信息精准对接具有政策启示意义。

关键词:

Abstract:

Drawing on co-production theory, this study, through an empirical analysis of centralized residential governance in L Village, X Town, Shanghai, reveals that policy communication is inherently a co-productive process. However, the interplay between structural environments and residents’daily lives generates“information noise”—subjective cognitive distortions that hinder effective communication. In this context, grassroots policy implementers act as“noise reducers,”employing policy discourse, local knowledge, and affective narratives to align diverse public perceptions into a shared framework, thereby fostering consensus. This study extends co-production theory from public service delivery to policy process analysis, uncovering the dual constructedness of communication (the state-society interplay) and offering practical insights for enhancing governance precision.

Key words:

中图分类号: