English

上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 105-119.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

身体界面的退场：反思数字化时代的技术化姿态
——与弗卢塞尔的对话

  

  1. 胡 翼 青:南京大学 新闻传播学院

    刘 静:安徽大学 新闻传播学院

  • 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 作者简介:
    胡翼青，南京大学新闻传播学院教授。研究方向：传播理论、传播学史。
    刘静，安徽大学新闻传播学院硕士研究生。研究方向：传播理论。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目（18BGL234）；江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助项目（2019）

The Retreat of the Bodily Interface: Rethinking the Technologization of Gestures in the Digital Age
— A Dialogue with Vilém Flusser

  1. HU Yiqing：School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing University
    LIU Jing： School of Journalism and Communication, Anhui University
  • Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-17

摘要： 自2018年以来，身体作为交流界面逐渐成为传播学界关注的焦点问题之一，姿态的研究进入人们的视野。这一研究脉络最早可以追溯到达尔文的进化论。在此基础上，米德以姿态为核心发展出了符号互动论。不过，过度强调符号和语言重要性的米德并没有发现姿态的技术化向度。基于身体现象学的视角，弗卢塞尔发现了技术物在姿态中的角色。在当下数智媒体时代，数字化技术渗透在社交媒体用户交流姿态的每一个环节。在这一过程中，身体退场，被数字界面所遮蔽，人的交流被纳入巨大的数字基础设施之中。尽管弗卢塞尔寄希望于通过装置使人与人能更自由地交流，但人越来越明显地只是在和装置本身交流。

关键词:

Abstract: Since 2018, the body as a communicative interface has gradually become a focal concern incommunication studies, bringing the study of gestures into renewed view. This line of inquiry can be traced backto Darwin's theory of evolution; building on this foundation, Mead developed symbolic interactionism, placinggestures at its core. However, by overemphasizing the primacy of symbols and language, Mead failed torecognize the technologized dimension of gestures. From the perspective of embodied phenomenology, VilemFlusser identified the role of technical objects within gestures. In today's era of digitally intelligent media,digital technologies permeate every facet of social media users gestural exchanges. In this process, the bodyretreats, occluded by digital interfaces, and human communication is subsumed into vast digital infrastructures.Although Flusser hoped that apparatuses would enable freer communication among people, it has becomeinereasingly evident that individuals are, to a growing extent, communicating primarily with the apparatusesthemselves.

Key words:

中图分类号: