上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 84-93.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

论现成品的美学意义:对何为艺术的再思考

  

  1. 山东师范大学 新闻与传媒学院
  • 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-26
  • 作者简介:赵卿,山东师范大学新闻与传媒学院副教授。研究方向:艺术社会学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(24CZW004)

The Aesthetic Significance of Readymades: Rethinking What Is Art

  1. School of Journalism and Communication, Shandong Normal University
  • Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-26
  • Supported by:
    readymade aesthetics; art institution; Peter Bürger; Boris Groys

摘要:

现成品与当代艺术之关系具有进一步阐释的空间。通过考察现成品以不同方式 进入艺术史的历程,可以印证比格尔如下观点:以杜尚为代表的现成品实验,通过观念的生 产,挑战了资产阶级自律美学观与原则,然而这样的挑战随后被资产阶级艺术体制所接受。 但比格尔的下述结论值得质疑:一旦现成品被体制化,其意识形态批判的效能也就随之耗尽。 借助格罗伊斯的艺术理论,对现成品在博物馆内部实际功能性作用进行分析,可以发现,现成品以栖居于体制内部的异己之力,促使博物馆产生某种自我反思的机制,从而在保留现成品政治批判潜能的同时,也促使艺术体制不断推陈出新。

关键词:

Abstract:

The relationship between readymades and contemporary art holds further interpretative significance. By examining the historical trajectory of readymades entering art history in various ways, Peter Bürger’s observation can be accepted: that the readymade experiments represented by Duchamp, through the production of concepts, challenged bourgeois autonomous aesthetic principles. However, this attack was later assimilated by the bourgeois art system. Yet, Bürger’s conclusion that once readymades become institutionalized, their ideological critique loses its effectiveness is questionable. Drawing on Boris Groys’art theory and analyzing the actual functional role of readymades within museums, one can observe that readymades, as an external force residing within the institution, prompt a certain self-reflective mechanism within museums. In turn, this preserves the politically critical potential of readymades while also driving the artistic system toward continuous innovation.

中图分类号: