上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 13-24.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

《中华人民共和国仲裁法》修订的涉外法治之维

  

  1. 中国政法大学国际法学院;上海政法学院国际法学院
  • 出版日期:2024-09-15 发布日期:2024-09-13
  • 作者简介:冯硕(1994- ),男,山东济南人。中国政法大学国际法学院博士后研究人员、上海政法学院国际法学院讲师。研究方向:国际私法、国际经济法。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(23YJC820010)

Revision of the China’s Arbitration Law from the Perspective of Foreign-related Rule of Law

  1. International Law School, China University of Political Science and Law;
    International Law School, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law


  • Online:2024-09-15 Published:2024-09-13

摘要: 统筹推进国内法治和涉外法治是《中华人民共和国仲裁法》修订的重要指导思想,如何借助修法不断优化营商环境并打造国际仲裁中心和一流仲裁机构是亟须关注的问题。相较于《承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》和《联合国贸易法委员会国际商事仲裁示范法》,《中华人民共和国仲裁法》仍在仲裁地、临时仲裁等方面存在制度短板,对仲裁机构的定位不清更阻碍中国仲裁制度的完善,临时措施和司法审查标准的不确定也弱化了中国仲裁的国际竞争力。所以,《中华人民共和国仲裁法》修订既要对标国际加快制度补缺,也要明确仲裁机构的法律地位并为其发展进行松绑,更要立足中国实际,在分轨制下完善仲裁临时措施和裁决执行的审查标准,助力涉外法治建设。

关键词: 《中华人民共和国仲裁法》, 涉外法治, 习近平法治思想, 国际仲裁

Abstract:

An important guiding principle of the revision of the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China is to coordinate the advancement of both domestic and foreign-related rule of law. A pressing issue is how to continually optimize the business environment and create international arbitration centers and first-class arbitration institutions through legislative amendments. Compared with the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China still has institutional

shortcomings in areas such as the seat of arbitration and ad hoc arbitration. The unclear positioning of arbitral institutions further hinders the improvement of China’s arbitration system. Additionally, the indeterminate interim measures and judicial review standards weaken the international competitiveness of Chinese arbitration. Therefore, the revision of the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China should not only align with international standards to accelerate institutional improvement, but also clarify the legal status of arbitration

institutions and loosen restrictions on their development. Moreover, it should be based on China’s actual situation to improve the standards for interim measures and arbitration enforcement under the bifurcated

system, thereby assisting in the construction of foreign-related rule of law.

Key words: Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China, foreign-related rule of law, Xi Jinping Thought on the rule of law, international arbitration

中图分类号: