上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 19-36.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

良知与正当共时性存在下的 算法正义原则 ——兼反思赫拉利《未来简史:从智人到智神》之提问

  

  1. 重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院
  • 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-05-16
  • 作者简介:费小兵(1974- ),女,重庆人。重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院副教授,法学博 士。研究方向:法理学、信息法哲学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CFX035);重庆市人文社会科学基地网络社会发展问题研究中心项目(2018skjd04)

Principles of Algorithmic Justice under the Synchronic Existence of Conscience and Justification —Reflecting Concurrently on the Questions Posed by Harari in Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow

  1. School of Cyberspace Security and Information Law, Chongqing University of Posts andTelecommunications
  • Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-05-16

摘要:

道与现代自然法的共时性存在,体现为纯粹良知与正当的共时性存在,这有助于预防数据进化人文主义及其相关的技术权贵+专用AI、脑机结合、通用AI等导致的人类灾难。其思路体现为德性上的三层逻辑阶梯,为了预防其共时性存在的冲突,需要在算法多元救济制度中进行功能划界:功利论(可体现为数据主义)与义务论(如正当优先)相对更适用于传统法域如私法法域,具体如平台与个人个性协议等;纯粹良知论下的法之道即中国自然法,可推出良知优先原则,日常隐而不用,限制适用于社会法法域,如涉及新人类、强AI等共同良知议题。综上是预防数据进化人文主义的算法正义观,推论出以大范围正义为旨归的算法正义总原则:良知与正当的功能划界原则;即涉及强AI等社会法法域问题时良知优先,而私法等法域下正当优先。分原则是:虚拟界与自然界平等原则,新人类与人类平等原则,等。推衍之规则如:人控制机规则,即人的自由以不能选择脑机结合中的“机控制人”为前提。建议将此规

则写入全球神经技术指南。

关键词: 算法, 良知, 正当, 共时性存在, 社会法

Abstract:

The synchronic existence of Dao and modern natural law is manifested in the coexistence of pure conscience and justification, which helps prevent human disasters caused by data evolutionary humanism as well as technocrat plus special AI, general AI plus brain-computer integration, and so on. The idea is structured as a three-tiered logical ladder based on virtue. To prevent the conflicts arising from synchronic existence, a functional demarcation is necessary within the algorithmic diversity of remedial systems. Utilitarianism (which can be manifested as datism) and deontology (such as the priority of rights) are more suited to traditional legal domains such as private law, platform agreements, and individual personalized agreements.The Dao of law under the theory of pure conscience theory or Chinese natural law, can introduce the principle of conscience  rioritization, which is latent in daily practice, thus restricting its application to social law domains, including issues involving common conscience such as New Humanity and Strong AI. In summary, this algorithmic view of justice which is intended to prevent data evolutionary humanism, can infer the general algorithmic principle under the universe-wide justice: the principle of demarcation between conscience and justice, i. e., the principle of the conscience prioritization in social law domains and right prioritization in traditional law domains. Sub-principles include the principle of equality between the virtual and nature worlds and the principle of equality between digital and real humans. Derivative rules include the rule of human

controlling the machine whereby human freedom is predicated on the inability to choose“machine control of man”in brain-computer integration. The author recommends that its rules be included in the global neurotechnology guide.

Key words: algorithm, conscience, just, synchronic existence, social law

中图分类号: