上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 28-39.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

生成式人工智能治理的法律回应

  

  1. 上海大学法学院
  • 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
  • 作者简介:袁曾(1988- ),男,湖北孝昌人。上海大学法学院副研究员,最高人民检察院法治前海研 究基地、南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海)兼职研究员。研究方向:数字法学、国际 法学。
  • 基金资助:

    上海市教育法学人才培养计划(2023JYFXR068);

    上海大学地方高水平大学2023年度建设项目教学改革与研究专项(N50-2023P0008)

Infrastructure for Generative AI Governance

  1. Law School, Shanghai University
  • Online:2023-11-15 Published:2024-01-15

摘要: 生成式人工智能的规模化应用对社会治理造成了现实风险,其作为生产工具已具
备了类人化的推理能力与行为能力,在知识产权领域、刑事领域、数据应用领域等引发的新生
问题已超出了现行法律的规制范围,私人技术资本正在成为数字空间的真实权力拥有者。但
现行人工智能的治理范式过分聚焦于算法规制,而忽视了相关责任主体的整体义务建构,导致
法学理论无法适应新生技术的发展,对解决实际问题的现实方法论意义不强。面对生产力水
平跃升引致的问题,法律规制特别是相关规则研究应靠前一步,以结构化的体系思维与完整的
框架建构完善新一代人工智能治理范式,确保以规则优势引领产业发展优势与制度优势。

关键词: 生成式人工智能, 社会治理, 网络暴力, 数字权力

Abstract: The large-scale introduction of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has caused real risks to
social governance. As a production tool possessing humanized reasoning and behavioral ability, it has caused
new problems in the field of intellectual property rights, criminal law, and data application, which have gone
beyond the scope of existing laws. Private technology capital is becoming the real power holder in the digital
space. However, the current AI governance paradigm focuses too much on the regulation of algorithms while
neglecting the overall obligations of the relevant responsible subjects, leading to the failure of legal theories in
catching up with the development of new technologies and weak practical methodological significance in solving
practical problems. In the face of the problems caused by the hike in productivity level, the research on legal
regulations, especially on relevant rules, should take a step forward, construct and improve the new generation
of AI governance paradigm with structured system thinking and a holistic framework,

Key words: generative AI, social governance, cyber violence, digital power

中图分类号: