上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 118-134.

• • 上一篇    

比较框架下的家庭重要性评价:对个体化理论的再思考 

  

  1. 复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院
  • 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
  • 作者简介:胡安宁(1983- ),男,山东枣庄人。复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院教授、博士生导师。 研究方向:文化与宗教、社会分层与流动、社会研究方法。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(22ZDA081)

Evaluation of Family Importance in a Comparative Framework:Rethinking the Theory of Individualization 

  1. School of Social Developent and Public Policy, Fudan University
  • Online:2023-11-15 Published:2024-01-15

摘要: 围绕家庭这一社会基本构成单位,个体化理论从“脱嵌”和“复嵌”两个角度分别呈
现了“束缚命题”和“保护命题”,前者将家庭视为个体化进程中的束缚力量,而后者将家庭视
为保护个体抵御各种风险的保护器。围绕这两个命题,在利用多种方法分析世界价值观调查
数据的基础上,可以发现,个体化倾向强的个体对于家庭和朋友重要性的评价都显著偏低,而
家庭重要性评判和朋友重要性评判之间的差异与个体化的态度之间没有显著的联系。在家
庭与工作、家庭与休闲时间之间,个体化倾向更加促使个体赋予工作和休闲时间以更高的重
要性。这说明个体化进程对于家庭制度的冲击只是其对超越个体的集体性机制冲击的个例。
除了家庭之外,个体化过程也会对其他集体性机制(如交友)产生影响。尽管家庭重要性评价
取决于家庭是否有足够强的经济能力抵御风险,但是,对家庭经济状况更好的个体而言,相比
于家庭,其更加愿意赋予朋友以及休闲时间以更高的重要性。这一发现表明,一个具有良好
经济状况的家庭是促使个体化的一种助力。

关键词: 新家庭主义, 个体化, 家庭重要性, 家庭外视角

Abstract: The individualization theories about family, which is the basic social unit, present the
“restriction proposition”and the“protection propositions”from the perspective of“dis-embedding”and“reembedding”
respectively. The former regards family as an institutional restrictive mechanism in the process of
individualization process while the latter views family as a protector of individuals from various risks. Based on
these two propositions, this study uses a variety of methods to analyze the survey data of the World Values
Survey. The results show that individualized attitudes have no significant explanatory power for the differences
between the importance of family and the importance of friends, although it decreases the perceived importance
of both family and friends. Between family and work, as well as between family and leisure time, individualized
propensity encourages one to assign greater importance to work and leisure time. These findings suggest that the
impact of the individualization process on the family system is only one case of its general impact on social
aggregations. In addition to its impact on family, the process of individuation has implications for other
mechanisms of assemblage, such as friendship. Moreover, individuals with better family financial status assign
more importance to friends and leisure than to family although they assess the importance of family in
accordance with its financial capability to protect one from the risks in life. Therefore, a family with good
financial status can be a promoting factor for individuals to engage in the individualization process.

Key words: neo-familism, individualization, importance of family, perspective from outside the family

中图分类号: