上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 18-28.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

从元宇宙到法律3.0: 兼论人工智能法的谱系

  

  1. 上海交通大学 凯原法学院
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-09 修回日期:2023-04-09 接受日期:2023-06-09 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-07-20
  • 作者简介:刘新宇(1979- ),男,山东威海人。上海交通大学凯原法学院博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(19YJC820003);上海市哲学社会科学规划青年项目 (2018EFX007)

From Metaverse to Law 3.0: The Genealogy of the AI Act

  1. KoGuan School of Law, Shanghai Jiaotong University
  • Received:2023-02-09 Revised:2023-04-09 Accepted:2023-06-09 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-07-20

摘要:     元宇宙是大数据、人工智能、5G、AR/VR 等既有技术融合应用构造的数字化空间。 传统法律1.0设计规则体系调整特定的事实。法律2.0具备了新规则和监管框架,直接服务于 相关政策。法律 3.0承认新技术亦是监管工具。技术对法治系统的影响始于系统论,兴于网 络法。人工智能法治不同于互联网法治。用户以数字人进行生存、交互,算法化主体除了共 识机制(代码)之外,再无任何层次结构。法律3.0并不意味着法律2.0或1.0的终结。法律3.0 将重新理解监管责任作为核心,对技术工具的使用设置三重许可。国内外最新的人工智能立 法实践体现了法律3.0的精神。

关键词: 元宇宙, 法律3.0, 分布式法治, 算法主体, 习惯法

Abstract:     Metaverse is a digital space resulted from the integration of existing technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence, 5G and AR/VR. Traditional Law 1.0 has a rule system that regulates facts to be specified. Law 2.0 contains new rules and regulatory framework, thus directly serving relevant policies. Law 3.0 recognizes that new technologies are also regulatory tools. The influence of technology on legal system began with“system theory”and flourished in cyberlaw. However, the AI rule of law is different from the Internet rule of law in that users live and interact with digital people, and the algorithmic entities share no hierarchical structure except consensus mechanism (code). Law 3.0 does not mean the end of Law 2.0 or Law 1.0. Instead, it reinterprets regulatory responsibility as the core and sets up a“triple license”for the use of technical tools. The latest AI legislative practice home and abroad embodies the spirit of Law 3.0.

Key words: Metaverse, Law 3.0, decentralized rule of law, algorithm entity, unwritten law 

中图分类号: