上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 17-33.

• 影视理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

后人类主义在十字路口:危险图景、“破碎的星球”与另寻更好出路

  

  1. 加州大学洛杉矶分校 英语系
  • 出版日期:2022-07-16 发布日期:2022-11-27

Posthumanism at a Crossroads:Dangerous Vision, “Broken Earth” and the Search for Better Pathways

  • Online:2022-07-16 Published:2022-11-27

摘要: 拉图尔在新作《面对盖娅》中提出了新气候体制,进一步推进他关于行动者网络的思想,他以“行动波”这一概念,激活了物质过程,提出能动性在于环境与生物体的联合。然而,拉图尔此举无疑是抹除了物质过程和生物体的区别。我们必须在行动者与能动者之间作出区分,前者是有意向性的,而后者只是以一种隐喻的方式表达利害关系。针对拉图尔在科学与技术的人文社会学研究领域中试图化约科学与宗教的做法,我们需要认识到,否证的力量相较实证同样不容忽视,所谓事实是在社会、政治、科学等多重辩论与争夺中建构起来的。更应该警惕的是,拉图尔划分的所谓“地族”与“人类”的对立,在擦除了一切权威、民族、国家之后,各方势力互相竞争与消耗,并不会真的带来任何积极的改变。在这个意义上,N.K.杰米辛的科幻小说三部曲“破碎的星球”就像是拉图尔思想的一场具体的实验,小说中的意向性地球,以及极端条件下社会、政治、经济、情感力量的博弈与争斗,都能看出拉图尔的方案是极具危险性的。承认生物体不同于物质过程的特殊性,创建新的框架,发起所有生命形式的团结,打开人类与非人类之间建立联盟的契机,或许才是一条更好的道路。

关键词: 后人类主义, 布鲁诺·拉图尔, N.K.杰米辛, 盖娅, 行动者网络

Abstract: In the new work Facing Gaia, Latour proposes the New Climatic Regime that further advances his idea of Actor-Network Theory(ANT), using the concept “waves of action” to activate material processes and suggesting that agency lies in the union of environment and organism. In this regard, Latour undoubtedly erases the distinction between material processes and organisms, emphasizing that a distinction must be made between actors and agents, with the former having intentionality, while the latter merely expressing the stakes in a metaphorical way. In response to Latour’s attempt to sociate Science and Religion in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS), we should notice that the power of disconfirmation cannot be ignored, and that so-called facts are constructed in the midst of social, political, and scientific debates and contests. What is more alarming is that the “earthbound” versus “humans” dichotomy by Latour does not really bring about any positive change after erasing all authorities, nations, and states. In this sense, N.K. Jemisin’s science fiction trilogy “Broken Earth” is like a concrete experiment of Latour’s thought. By analyzing the intentional Earth, the struggle of social, political, economic and emotional forces under extreme conditions, we conclude that Latour’s vision is extremely dangerous. Acknowledging the specificity of living organisms as distinct from material processes, creating a new framework that initiates the unity of all life forms and opens the opportunity to build alliances between humans and non-humans might be a better pathway.

Key words: Posthumanism, Bruno Latour, N. K. Jemison, Gaia, Actor-Network