上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 29-44.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

司法区块链的价值目标及其实现路径

  

  1. 华东政法大学 法律学院
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-13 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-03-15

Judicial Blockchain: Values, Goals and Approaches to Realization

  1. Law School, East China University of Political Science and Law,
  • Received:2021-07-13 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-03-15

摘要: 司法区块链作为一种新型的信任机制,在推进诉源治理、提升审判效率、实现司法便民、深化司法公开、强化监督管理等方面,已展现出独特的应用价值。司法区块链作为智慧司法的重要环节,必须秉承传统司法的人文底蕴,坚守司法的本质属性,以实现数字正义为建设目标。从应用价值、建设目标、必要性三个维度,可对司法区块链的具体应用场景进行检验,发现其存在的问题与风险。例如,系统安全风险,可能造成新的诉讼负担,在一定程度上“重复建设”“建用脱节”,部分应用场景不利于权利保障,与司法被动中立的属性存在一定冲突,部分应用可为其他信任机制所替代,等。唯有坚持去中心、开放式的架构设计,以人的权利保护为中心,规范限制司法区块链的多维应用,形成司法区块链与其他信任机制之间的良性协同,方可最终实现司法区块链的价值目标。

关键词: 司法区块链, 智慧司法, 智能合约, 信任机制, 数字正义

Abstract:  Judicial blockchain, a new type of trust mechanism, has shown unique value in promoting “governance at the source of litigation”, improving trial efficiency, realizing judicial convenience, deepening judicial openness and strengthening supervision and management. As an important link of “smart justice”, judicial blockchain must inherit the humanistic foundation of traditional justice, adhere to the essential attributes of justice and take the realization of digital justice as its goal. Examining the application scenarios of judicial blockchain from the three dimensions of application value, construction goal and necessity, we can find its problems and risks, such as system security risk, possible new litigation burden, “duplication of construction” and “disconnection between construction and use” to a certain extent. Moreover, some application scenarios are not conducive to rights protection; it may conflict with the attribute of passive neutrality of justice; and some applications can be replaced by other trust mechanisms. Only by adhering to the decentralized and open architecture design, focusing on the protection of human rights, regulating and limiting the multi-dimensional applications of judicial blockchain, and aiming at the benign synergy between judicial blockchain and other trust mechanisms, can we finally realize the values and goals of judicial blockchain.

Key words: judicial blockchain, smart justice, smart contract, trust mechanism, digital justice

中图分类号: