上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 42-53.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

实在界真的那么重要吗?#br# ——齐泽克电影批评的反思#br#

  

  1. 中山大学 中国语言文学系
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-21 出版日期:2022-01-15 发布日期:2022-01-15

Is the Real Really So Important?#br# —Reflection on Zizek’s Film Criticism#br#

  1. Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Sun Yat-sen University,
  • Received:2020-05-21 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2022-01-15

摘要:  作为拉康的当代传人,齐泽克面对更加稳固的资本主义意识形态,从晚期拉康的实在界理论中发挥出否定的批判力量,进行激烈的思想批判。其电影批评散落着指涉实在界的各种术语(如客体小a、原质、征兆),它不仅标识电影文本的深度,而且意味着特殊的思辨逻辑与思维方式。齐泽克从黑格尔主仆互认的外在辩证法推进到拉康的内在否定辩证法,彰显出思辨的种种精彩。然而,电影作为具有完整结构的叙事体,其基本构成是基于因果逻辑的日常经验。深刻未必是电影艺术的唯一标准;电影批评也并非是把文本意义揭示得越深刻越好。从这个角度说,虽然实在界对于拉康以及齐泽克的理论研究具有重大意义,但对于电影及其批评来说,其重要性值得反思。

关键词: 电影批评, 实在界, 深度, 否定性内涵, 思维方式

Abstract:  As Lacan’s “contemporary successor”, Zizek, in the face of a more stable capitalist ideology, made strong criticism with a force of negation based on Lacan’s later theory of the subject as the Real. In Zizek’s film criticism we can find various terminologies referring to the Real (such as the object “a”, the Thing and symptom), which not only mark the profundity of film texts, but also indicate unique logic and way of thinking. Zizek advanced from Hegel’s external dialectics of mutual recognition of master and servant to Lacan’s internal negative dialectics, showing the power of his intellectual wits. However, as a narrative with complete structure, film has its own basic structure based on daily experience of causality. Profundity is not necessarily the only standard of film art, nor is the case that the deeper film criticisms reveal the the meaning of film texts, the better they become. In this sense, although the Real is of great significance to Lacan and Zizek’s theoretical researches, its importance to film and its criticism is worthy of reflection.

Key words: film criticism, the Real, profundity, negative connotation, way of thinking

中图分类号: