上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 46-55.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

后理论、后电影与文化研究之后的理论#br# ——再论后理论之争#br#

  

  1. 中山大学 中文系
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-20 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2021-09-15

Post Theory, Post-cinema and After Theory of Cultural Studies:Revisiting the Debate of Post Theory

  1. Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Sun Yat-sen University,
  • Received:2020-01-20 Online:2021-09-15 Published:2021-09-15

摘要:  电影研究的后理论、后电影等概念,与文学理论使用的后结构、理论之后等,虽都翻译为中文“后”,却有其各自的问题意识与对话对象。在厘清概念的基础上,齐泽克对波德维尔等人后理论的批判,具有转折时代的特定思想意义。在文化研究衰微之时,齐泽克的再符号化与后理论的认知研究,构成了“索卡尔—文本”事件之后人文知识生产的不同理论选择。在当前后电影状态下,文化研究的持续发展与电影哲学的稳步推进,显示着新文科建设过程中人文研究的新契机与挑战。

关键词:  , 后理论;齐泽克;后电影;文化研究

Abstract:  Though both translated into Chinese expressions with the character of “后”, “Post Theory” and “post-cinema” in film studies and “post structuralism” and “After Theory” in literary theories are fundamentally different in that they have unique research questions and topics for discussions. ?i?ek’s criticism of the “Post Theory” on the basis of concept clarification, has a particular ideological significance in the transitional era. In the decline of Cultural Studies, ?i?ek’s re-symbolization and cognitive research of post theories constitute alternating theoretical choices for the production of humanistic knowledge in the wake of the “sokal-text” event.In the current “Post-cinema” state, the continuous development of Cultural Studies and the steady advancement of film philosophy present new opportunities and challenges to the studies of humanities in the development of new liberal arts.

Key words: Post Theory, ?i?ek, post-cinema, cultural studies

中图分类号: