上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 85-97.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

邻接权的体系构成: 本源、性质、扩张

  

  1. 上海大学 法学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-23 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2021-07-15

The Structure of Neighbouring Right: Origin, Essence and Expansion#br# #br#

  1. Law School, Shanghai University, 
  • Received:2020-04-23 Online:2021-07-15 Published:2021-07-15

摘要: 肇始于罗马法时代的邻接权制度是广义著作权制度的重要组成部分。邻接权权利内容的法定性以及权利类型的多样性,使其一直为著作权法界所关注。但学界对于邻接权与狭义著作权的本源、属性等区别莫衷一是,我国著作权立法亦未直接对此作出回应。现有的广义著作权法理论由于缺乏法教义学上的体系指引,不仅无法充分发掘邻接权制度承载的规范意义,甚至因此而被诟病。从邻接权体系的制度溯源与本质属性入手,可重点探讨各类邻接权共通的规范效力,力求更好地把握其与狭义著作权之间的异同关系,寻求其扩张限度内的价值指引,补充完善著作权法的理论体系。

关键词: 邻接权, 狭义著作权, 广义著作权, 独创性

Abstract:  Neighbouring right, an important part of the generalized copyright architecture, can be traced back to the Roman law era. Due to its statutory status and diverse types, neighbouring right has attracted the  academic attention from the very beginning. However, there has been neither consensus among scholars on its origin and essence, nor responses from China’s copyright legislation. The existing theory of the copyright law has failed to fully explore the normative significance of the neighboring right system due to the lack of systematic guidance of law doctrine, thus subjected to criticism. In view of this, the origin and essence of neighboring right is discussed and the common normative effect on all kinds of neighbouring rights is explored and emphasized. In so doing, we aim to better grasp the similarities and differences between the neighboring right and the copyright in the narrow sense, seek the value guidance within the limit of the expansion of the neighbouring right, and supplement and perfect the theoretical system of the copyright law.

Key words: neighbouring right, copyright in the narrow sense, generalized copyright, originality

中图分类号: