上海大学学报(社会科学版)
• 中国问题 • 上一篇 下一篇
收稿日期:
出版日期:
发布日期:
Received:
Online:
Published:
摘要:
尽管《中华人民共和国民法总则》已将“数据”纳入“民事权利”一章,但其法律定位和保护方式远未明确。中国数据不正当竞争第一案——新浪微博诉脉脉不正当竞争案展示出两造及法院对于用户数据的不同理解。在商业秘密、反不正当竞争法一般条款和数据财产化的三重数据保护进路中,数据权的设计不但能为数据提供最佳保障,而且通过与个人信息权的折冲与调和,最终促成一套可预期性和灵活性兼备的数据保护制度。
关键词: 数据权, 反不正当法, 一般条款, 个人信息, 商业秘密
Abstract:
Although “data” has been included in the chapter of “Civil Rights” in The Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China, its legal status and approaches to protection are far from certainty. The first case of unfair competition for data in ChinaSina Weibo accusing Maimai of unfair completionreflects different understanding of user data by different parties: the plaintiff, the defendant and the court. Among the three approaches to date protection, namely,trade secret protection, the general clause of antiunfair competition law and data propertization, the right to data can provide the best protection of data, and what’s more, its reconciliation with the right to personal information may facilitate the formation of a predictable and flexible data protection system.
Key words: trade secrets, personal information, right to data, general clause, antiunfair competition law
许可. 数据保护的三重进路#br# ——评新浪微博诉脉脉不正当竞争案[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版).
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
链接本文: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/CN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/CN/Y2017/V34/I6/15