上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 影视理论研究·香港电影研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新中国少数民族影像书写:历史与政治
——兼对“重写中国电影史”的回应

 吕新雨(1965),女,安徽合肥人。华东师范大学传播学院教授,博士生导师,华东师范大学紫江特聘教授,华东师范大学-康奈尔比较人文研究中心主任,主要研究方向为中国新纪录运动、影视理论、文化研究、传播政治经济学、三农问题等。   

  • 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2015-09-15

The Portrayal of the Images of the Ethnic Minorities in New China
——Concurrently Responding to the “Rewriting of Chinese Cinematic History”

  • Online:2015-09-15 Published:2015-09-15

摘要: 摘要:  通过对少数民族影像概念建构的批评性回顾,可以看出,从“华语语系”到“华语电影”等海外中国电影研究范式所存在的问题,是在遮蔽和否定新中国基于民族平等的政治理念的前提下而进行的丰富与复杂的影像实践。因此,需要回到统一战线与阶级斗争作为国家与民族话语变奏的历史脉络中去,无论少数民族地区的爱国统一战线,还是对第三世界“不结盟运动”的支持与国际主义援助,体现的都是在一个世界格局中进行阶级分析的政治视野。这一视野如何在今天的民族政策和国际关系中获得新的体认;中国电影研究,特别是少数民族电影研究,能否外在于这些历史的脉络与现实的挑战?这是今天少数民族电影历史研究的关键。同时,从社会发展与传播的视角可以检讨少数民族纪录电影史的社会政治意义,重新回顾“科学纪录片”与党对“真实性”的要求之间复杂而丰富的实践。在此基础上,才能重新讨论影像民主和电影史的主体性问题。

关键词: 少数民族影像书写, 历史与政治, 重写中国电影史

Abstract:  Through a critical review of the conceptual construction of the images of Chinese ethnic minorities, we can see the problems underlying the oversees research paradigms of Chinese cinemas such as “Chinese Language Cinema” and “Sinophone Cinema”, which are rich and complicated image practice on the premise of masking and negating the political conceptions of ethnic equality in new China. Therefore, it is essential to return to the United Front and class struggle which are the State and national discourse variations of the historical line. Be it the patriotic united front in the regions of ethnic minorities, the support to the Third World's nonalignment or the international aid, all is embodied in the same world pattern with the political perspective of class struggle. How to shed new light on the perspective in the current ethnic policies and international relations? Can the studies of ethnic minorities be divorced from the historical line and practical challenges? These are key questions to the film studies of ethnic minorities. Meanwhile, the paper examines the social and political significance of the documentaries of the ethnic minorities from the view of social development and communication, and revisits the complicated and diverse practice between “scientific documentary” and the “authenticity” the Party has required. Only by clarifying the above questions, can we renew the discussion of image democracy and the subjects of the cinematic history.

Key words: the portrayal of the images of the ethnic minorities, history and politics, rewriting the Chinese cinematic history