上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 历史学 • 上一篇    下一篇

国际左派中国研究与中国左派史学

  

  1. 华东师范大学历史学系
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-23 出版日期:2014-09-15 发布日期:2014-09-15
  • 作者简介:李孝迁(1977-),男,浙江温州人。华东师范大学历史学系副教授,历史学博士,主要研究中国近现代史学史、中外学术交流史。
  • 基金资助:

     教育部人文社科基金项目(11YJC770025)

 China Studies by the International Leftwing Group and the Leftist Historiography of China

  • Received:2013-11-23 Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-09-15

摘要: 中国左派史学的形成过程中,国际左派的中国研究曾经发挥积极作用。中国左派学人学习国际左派的中国研究,组合、扬弃各种理论资源,建构了本土化的左派史学。中国左派史学对国际左派史学有承袭,也与它有竞争,并力图在竞争中获取本土史家的自主地位。

关键词:  , 左派史学, 社会史论战, 中国研究, 中国化

Abstract: In the formation of the leftist historiography of China, China studies by the international leftwing group has exerted considerable influence, as is evident in these great works including Historiography in China by Arif Dirlik, Studies of Chinese Rural Economy by Madjar, History of China’s Social Evolution by Safonov, History of China’s Social Economy by Sengu Keji, and Textbook of China’s History by Zuoye Jiasamei. China’s leftwing scholars have constructed localized leftist historiography by compiling, translating, imitating and appropriating the fruits of China studies by the international leftwing group as well as by adapting, and reorganizing these foreign theories in a critical manner. Despite the heritage, Chinese scholars also rivaled the international leftwing group, particularly when the Communist Party of China proposed “sinicization of Marxism”. scholars of the Party, at least in talks and assertions, criticized the China studies by the international leftwing group, thus highlighting the independence of the historians of the Party.

Key words:  leftist historiography, debate over the social history, China studies, sinicization

中图分类号: