上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“补正”与“矫正”:刑事再审制度功能再探——兼论我国《刑事诉讼法》的修改                  

  

  1. 北京航空航天大学法学院
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-07 出版日期:2014-01-15 发布日期:2014-01-15

Rectification and Redress: An Inquiry into the Criminal Retrial System

  • Received:2012-10-07 Online:2014-01-15 Published:2014-01-15

摘要:  以终局裁判为逻辑前提的刑事再审制度,其正统性来自两方面:一是原来的程序运行本身出现了重大瑕疵;二是原程序尽管已经按照相关规则进行并完成,但其制度功能由于某种原因未能实现,并且触犯了其他重要价值。据此,刑事再审的制度功能可以从形式理性理论和程序规律角度区分为修复原程序运行瑕疵的“补正”以及帮助原程序功能复位的“矫正”。以“补正”和“矫正”的分类视角重新检视刑事再审的制度定位问题,有助于正确设计和解读刑事再审的具体制度,尤其是再审的启动制度。为了应对刑事再审实践困境,一方面需要从程序规律的分类研究视角将刑事再审启动事由加以整合和清理,另一方面也需要强化作为再审逻辑前提的原程序的制度建设。

关键词:  刑事再审, 功能, 补正, 矫正

Abstract:
(Law School, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China)Abstract: The criminal retrial system, whose logical premise is a final decision, becomes legitimized when certain serious defects occur in the original procedure, or when its expected functions fail somehow and meanwhile infringe on other significant values, even though the original procedure develops and is completed in accordance with rules. Therefore, from the perspective of the formal rational theory and the rules of procedure, the functions of criminal retrial system can be categorized into two groups: rectification as to fix the defects in the original procedure, and redress as to help restore the balance of values. Reexamining criminal retrial function orientation in terms of rectification and redress, we might better design and implement the specific institutions of criminal retrial, especially the reopening institution. To resolve the problems in the criminal retrial practice, it is necessary to classify and sort out the reopening reasons and to improve the original procedure, which serves as the premise of retrial.
Key words:

Key words:  criminal retrial, function, rectification, redress