上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 社会学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美教育公平关注重点的比较研究

窦卫霖,宋桂霞   

  1. 1.对外经济贸易大学英语学院; 2.滨州学院外语系
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-04 修回日期:2012-11-15 出版日期:2013-01-15 发布日期:2013-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 窦卫霖(1959-), 女,江苏扬州人。对外经济贸易大学英语学院教授,博士。主要研究方向:跨文化交际、话语分析、对外传播。
  • 作者简介:窦卫霖(1959-), 女,江苏扬州人。对外经济贸易大学英语学院教授,博士。主要研究方向:跨文化交际、话语分析、对外传播。
  • 基金资助:

    全国教育科学“十一五”规划2009年度课题(BFA090016)

A Comparison on the Focus of Education-Equity Research in China and America

DOU Wei-lin, SONG Gui-xia   

  1. 1.School of International Studies, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029,
    China;2.Foreign Languages Department, Binzhou University, Binzhou, Shandong 256600, China
  • Received:2012-09-04 Revised:2012-11-15 Online:2013-01-15 Published:2013-01-15

摘要: 通过对中美著名教育杂志《教育研究》和《哈佛教育评论》关于教育公平问题论文(1994—2010)的比较研究表明,教育公平问题在中美两国都受到高度重视。但由于发展水平和文化背景不同,对教育公平的关注重点存在明显差异。中国聚焦于农村教育和高考制度,研究取向上注重政策评论和宏观研究;美国聚焦于种族教育、女性教育和特殊人群教育,研究取向上注重政策调查和微观教学研究。我们从中可获取推进我国教育公平的若干思考和对策建议。

关键词: 教育公平, 关注重点, 《教育研究》, 《哈佛教育评论》, 中美比较

Abstract: By comparing related articles in Education Research and Harvard Education Review of the past 17 years (1994—2010), the paper discusses the differences of educationequity focus between China and America. Statistics indicate that both of the two countries attach much importance to the issue of education equity, but, due to the gap in terms of development level and culture background, their research focuses differ significantly. While China emphasizes rural education and college entrance examination system, America sheds more light on racist, women's and special education. As to methodology, China tends to carry out policy review and macroexamination, but America always conducts policy investigation and microteaching research. Based on these findings, some implications and suggestions can be drawn from the present study to promote the development of education equity in China.

Key words: Education equity, research focus, Edication Research, Harvard Education Review, comparison between China and America

中图分类号: