上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 影视理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

当代中国的“三种电影”与电影批评方法论  

  

  1. 浙江传媒学院文学院
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-03 出版日期:2012-09-15 发布日期:2012-09-15
  • 作者简介:薛峰(1978), 男,湖北安陆人。浙江传媒学院文学院影视文学系讲师,电影学博士。

"Three Movies" and Movie Criticism Methodology in Contemporary China

  • Received:2012-05-03 Online:2012-09-15 Published:2012-09-15

摘要:

什么是好电影,这是一个关于电影艺术的终极命题。“三种电影”的概念及一套标准可以试着探讨当代中国电影史和电影批评方法。“通俗电影”以娱乐宣泄、满足好奇梦幻、疏通道德情感为功能;“社会电影”以经世致用、维护社会稳定、巩固集体意识为使命;“探索电影”以形式实验、叩审人生哲理、揭示社会问题为追求。在当前中国电影多元并存、分化互渗的格局中,笼统区分优劣高下是没有意义的。只有真正确立电影功能“多元分工意识”,分清电影批评标准,给予电影以“各有侧重、主次分明”的定位解析,才能有效过滤无序争论,从学理思考的源头上减少率性粗鄙的攻讦谩骂。

关键词: “三种电影”, 通俗电影, 社会电影, 探索电影

Abstract:

"What is a good movie" is the hardest question about motion picture arts. Based on the classification of "three movies" and a set of standards, the present paper discusses the movie history and movie criticism methods of contemporary China. "Popular movies"tend to entertain people, vent feelings, satisfy curiosity and examine morality; "social movies" aim to offer practical enlightenment, maintain social stability and consolidate collective consciousness; "exploratory movies" seek to conduct form experiments, observe life philosophy and reveal social problems. Facing the current Chinese movie pattern, which is composed of the coexistence, differentiation and interinfiltration of multiple movie categories, it is meaningless to make a general quality assessment of the movies. Only when the "consciousness of multiple labor division" is truly awakened, when standards for movie criticism are made clear, and when movies are analyzed with respect for their "focuses and features", can the pointless debate on them be effectively filtered and the vulgar abuse of them be rationally reduced.

Key words: "three movies", popular movies, social movies, exploratory movies

中图分类号: