上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 特稿 •    下一篇

文艺学的回望与前瞻 

曾军   

  1. 上海大学文学院,上海 200444
  • 出版日期:2012-01-15 发布日期:2012-01-15

2012: A Review of Literature Science: Retrospect and Prospect

  1. College of Liberal Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • Online:2012-01-15 Published:2012-01-15

摘要: 摘要: 经过新世纪十余年的激烈争论,中国的文艺学界开始逐渐冷静下来,一些更为重要的问题开始突显。文艺学应该处理好如下三种关系:文艺学学科与其他学科之间的关系;文艺学与新的文化现实的关系;文艺学与中西文论资源及文学基本问题的关系。文艺学的“名不符实”实际上为其自身提供了拓展跨学科研究的空间,回归“文艺”本位,增强“历史”意识应该是文艺学学科的选择;新的文化现实需要新的文学分析方法和理论工具对之进行更有效的解释,这正是文艺学学科的主要任务;立足于中西文论资源的学术史及对文学基本问题的激活,有助于确立我们在面对“新的文化现实”时的学术立场和提问方式。

关键词: 文论资源, 关键词:文艺学, 学科际, 新的文化现实

Abstract: After over a decade' s ardent controversy in the new century, the field of literature science in China has gradually calmed down, and some important problems get foregrounded. The present paper elaborates on such basic issues as the relationships between literature and other subjects, between literary theory and cultural reality, and between Chinese and western literary theory resources. It proposes that "the unworthiness of the name" provides literature science with expanded space for interdisciplinary research, targeting  "returning to the literary per se" and enhancing historical consciousness in literature science. The new cultural reality asks for new literary research theory and methodology to achieve more effective interpretation, which is right one of the tasks of literature science. A view of both the academic history based on Chinese and western literary theory resources and a revisit to the basic problems in literary research will contribute to eradicating our academic position and questioning approach in face of the '"new cultural reality".

Key words: Key words: 〖WTBZ]literature science, interdisciplinary boundaries, new cultural reality, literary theory resources