上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 影视理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

电影《决裂》 ——文革后期被勾兑的“政治贺岁片”

  

  • 收稿日期:2010-06-09 出版日期:2010-09-15 发布日期:2010-09-15

Breaking with Old Ideas: An Untrue "Political New Year' s
Film" at the Later Period of the Cultural Revolution

  • Received:2010-06-09 Online:2010-09-15 Published:2010-09-15

摘要:

建国60周年来,中国电影经历了无数的风风雨雨;中国电影史60年的历史画卷里浓缩了社会史、文化史、思想史和斗争史。在众多引发争议的影片中,作为1976年的“政治贺岁片”(元月一日在全国上映),电影《决裂》是一部特别值得分析和回味的影片。美国具有冷战思维的电影史家汤普森和波德维尔在《世界电影史》中用了近一页的篇幅来讲叙这部电影,把《决裂》定位成“一部关于一所所谓农业大学的极具戏剧性的影片,极好地图解了毛泽东的思想”。[1]更奇怪的是三十多年过去了,最近不时地有人拿这部影片中的教育思想和政治理念来诟病当前几乎要走入死胡同的教育乱象。在人们提出现代化大学要追求“大楼、大师、大气”之时,有人用影片中的台词“看一个学校的好坏,不能只看有没有高楼大厦,也不能看有没有专家教授,要看这个学校培养什么样的学生”来寻求一种对旧有理想主义的追思。看好这部影片的人还不在少数。因为在《决裂》中不断被否定和批判的所谓资产阶级教育的一系列恶果,如工农子弟上不起大学、学非所用以及学生的价值观坍塌等似乎在当前都成了活生生的实例。因此,作为一个亲身经历过在共大的劳动生活,又亲眼目睹了30年中国教育改革和电影发展的过来人,笔者对这部电影的感受尤为独特。
关键词:

关键词:  电影《决裂》;文革后期;“三突出”; 江西共产主义劳动大学

Abstract:

Since the inception of the New China, the Chinese film has experienced numerous ups and downs. And the 60year historical picture of the Chinese film condenses a history of culture, thinking and struggle. Among the many controversial films, Breaking with Old Ideas, as the "political New Year' s film" of 1976 (Starting showing nationwide in January 1st), is an unforgettable film worthy of particular concern. In the book of Film History: an Introduction, Kristin Thompson and David Bordwell, two American film historians with the Cold War mentality, use a whole page to introduce this film, considering it "a drama about an agricultural college, illustrates how schematically Mao' s ideas were treated." Strange to say, 30 years later, from time to time, some people utilize the film' s educational thinking and political ideas to criticize the current educational chaos, which indicates that China' s education has almost gone into a dead end. While some propose the modern university' s "big buildings, great masters, and best environments", others use the film' s lines to yearn towards old idealism. For example, "Judging the quality of a school, we must see whether or not this school trains good students instead of seeing whether or not it has big buildings or firstlate professors." Moreover, many people give a positive judgment because the criticized phenomena in the film such as "peasants and workers can not afford university", "one cannot apply one' s education" and "the values of students collapse", seem to become living examples in the current time. Therefore, the author of this essay, who experiences the Communist Labor University of Jiangxi Province and witnesses the 30 years of education reform and film development, have a unique feeling for the film.