English

上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 唯识学 • 上一篇    下一篇

阿赖耶识、真如空性与如来藏心——大乘唯识学与如来藏思想辨微

吴可为   

  1. 浙江社会科学院哲学所，浙江杭州 310025
  • 收稿日期:2006-10-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-07-15 发布日期:2007-07-15

AlayaVijnana, BhutatathataShunyata and TathagataGarbha——Discrimination Between VidyaMatraShastra and TathagataGarbha Theory

WU Ke-wei   

  1. Institute of Philosophy, Zhejiang Academy of Social Sciences, Hangzhou 310025, China
  • Received:2006-10-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-07-15 Published:2007-07-15

被引次数

21

摘要： 如来藏概念相应于印度如来藏思想的三个发展阶段，可以区分为佛性如来藏、空性如来藏与识性如来藏三种不同而又有着本质关联的意义，其中识性如来藏与唯识学之间有着密切的关联。如来藏思想根本不存在所谓实体化倾向，它与唯识学的主要区别乃是解释学的原则和角度之不同。正是基于这一区别，识性如来藏与唯识虽然同样以第八识为依止，却开演成两种有重大区别的理论体系。同时，也由于两者之区别的根源只是解释学和方法论上的，则这两种看似正相对立的思想体系之间倒正隐含着一种建设性的互补关系。

关键词: 唯识, 如来藏, 空性, 阿赖耶识

Abstract: The connotation of Tathagatagarbha can be, corresponding to the three phases of Indian TathagataGarbha theory, divided into three different, interrelated parts, that is, Buddhist nature, immaterial nature and intelligent nature, among which, Tathagatagarbha of intelligent nature is closely related to Vij?ānamātra studies. The theory of Tathagatagarbha does not at all possess the tendency to the socalled substantialization. And the chief difference between it and vij?ānamātra studies lies in the different principle and perspective of interpretation. Just based on this difference, Tathagatagarbha of intelligent nature and vijānamātra develop into two different kinds of theoretical systems, although both of them depend on the eighth vijnana in the same way. Meanwhile, just because they are different from interpretation and methodology, two different systems in appearance imply a constructive relation of supplementing each other.

Key words: Tathagatagarbha, shunyata, alayavijnana, vijānamātra

中图分类号: