布迪厄符号权力理论评介

Abstract

Abstract:

Many scholars have reflected upon the relationship between language and power, which has so far attracted increasing attention in such disciplines as translation studies, sociolinguistics, social and cultural studies, and among the representatives are Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu. In Language and Symbolic Power, edited by John B. Thompson and translated into English by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson, Bourdieu not only deeply explored the symbolic power, but also profoundly analyzed the operation of language as political practice in the process of constructing and maintaining authority, inculcating knowledge and belief.

Key words: language;symbolic;Pierre Bourdieu;field

CLC Number:

I206.2

References

1］米哈伊尔·苏波特尼克. 言语行为哲学［M］ . 史忠义，译.天津：天津人民出版社，2003:246.
［2］维特根斯坦. 哲学研究［M］ . 汤潮,范光棣，译. 北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，1992:489.
［3］费尔克拉夫. 话语与社会变迁［M］ . 殷晓蓉，译.北京：华夏出版社，2004:59.
［4］索绪尔. 普通语言学教程［M］ . 高明凯，译. 北京：商务印书馆，2003:195.
［5］维特根斯坦. 哲学研究［M］ . 陈嘉映，译.上海：上海世纪出版集团，2001: 65.
［6］洪堡特. 论人类语言结构的差异及其对人类精神发展的影响［M］ . 姚小平，译. 北京：商务印书馆，2002:76.
［7］德里达. 论文字学［M］ . 汪家堂，译.上海：上海译文出版社，2005:194.
［8］福柯. 知识考古学［M］ . 谢强,马月，译. 北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2004:221.
［9］ M Shapiro. Language and Politics［M］ . Oxford: Basil Blakwell,1984:109.
［10］福柯. 疯癫与文明［M］ . 刘北成,杨远婴，译. 北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2009:1516.
［11］福柯. 词与物［M］ . 莫伟民，译. 上海：上海三联书店，2001:386-393.
［12］ Pierre Bourdieu. Language and Symbolic Power［M］. Cambridge:Harward University Press, 1991.
［13］朱国华. 权力的文化逻辑［M］ . 上海：上海三联书店，2004:85.
［14］ Pierre Bourdieu. Sociology in Question［M］. London: SAGE Publications, 1993:80.
［15］ Pierre Bourdieu. In Other Words［M］ . Stanford: Stanford University, 1990:139.
［16］布迪厄. 实践感［M］ . 蒋梓骅,译.南京：译林出版社，2003:186.
［17］张意. 文化与符号权力［M］ . 北京：中国社会科学出版社，2005:178.

[1]	. Reception and Interpretation of Nestorian Culture in the Song and Yuan Dynasties [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2013, 30(5): 77-86.
[2]	JIANG Yu-qin. A New View on Chinese Literary History ——After reading A Study of the Narrative Tradition of Chinese Literature [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2013, 30(2): 32-39.
[3]	XIONG Bi. Lyricism and Narratism ——On Researches of Two Expression Traditions in Chinese Literature [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2013, 30(2): 40-51.
[4]	. On the Process and Characteristics of Style Differentiation of Tanci in Qing Dynasty [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2012, 29(4): 62-71.
[5]	. On the Relationship Between Literary Men' s Lives in Qing Dynasty as Private Tutors and GrassRoots Writing ——Taking Pu Songling as the Study Case [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2012, 29(2): 110-120.
[6]	CHEN Qiang-Yuan, XU Chi-Chi. u Bo' s Party in the Hong Yun Club and the Hong Yun Club of Poetry ——An Example of the Literator' s Elegant Party in the Late Ming Dynasty [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2010, 17(06): 85-92.
[7]	HUANG Bi-Rong. Observing Semantic Cognition from the Meaning Distribution of Body Words [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2010, 17(06): 118-125.
[8]	NIU Hairong. Different Psychology of the Adherents of the Subjugated Song and Jin Dynasties and Its Expression in Poetry [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2008, 15(2): 69-75 .
[9]	CHAI Guo-zhen. The View on the Imperial Examination in Strange Tales from MakeDo Studio ——From the Perspective of Culture [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2007, 14(3): 39-42 .

An Analytical Introduction to Pierre Boudieu' s Symbolic Power

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments