English

上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

“非技术介入”与“定势排除”原则在“商标近似”判定中的适用

孙榕宁   

  1. 苏州市虎丘区人民法院，江苏苏州 215007
  • 收稿日期:2006-09-06 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-03-15 发布日期:2007-03-15

The Application of the Principles of the “NonTechnique Intervention” and the“Elimination of Mental Set” to the Judgment of the “Similar Trademarks”

SUN Rong ning   

  1. People’s Court in Huqiu District, Suzhou City, Suzhou 215007, China
  • Received:2006-09-06 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-03-15 Published:2007-03-15

摘要： “商标近似”的判定既是一个法律问题，也包含并符合了作为一个知识产权争议所需求的司法鉴定的形式和内涵；其既是一个技术性问题，也是一个含有技术边缘性、法律边缘性的“非技术介入”的属性问题。因此，必然要求我们探讨司法判定中的法律适用的主体与“双重客体”的对话途径。并从“商标近似”判定的视觉和心理特性（“定势排除”）及判定标准所蕴涵的主观性方面寻求判定近似的方法及路径所具有的符合其客观性要求的内在模式。

关键词: 商标近似, 非技术介入, 知识产权, 技术边缘性

Abstract: The judgment of the “similar trademarks” is a legal problem, and at the same time, contains and accords with the form and connotation of the judicial identification required by a dispute of intellectual property. It is not only a technical problem but also an attribute problem of non-technique intervention with technical and legal marginality. Therefore, we are consequentially required to probe into the dialogic approach between subjects and dual objects, which is applicable to the laws for judicial judgment. Meanwhile we should, from the vision of the judgment of the “similar trademarks”, and the mental feature of the “elimination of mental set” as well as the subjects contained in its judging standards, seek for the internal mode in accord with the objective requirement of the approach and route in judging similarities.

Key words: non-technique intervention, intellectual property right, technical marginality, similar trademarks

中图分类号: