上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国原子能立法之思考 

  

  1. 上海社会科学院法学研究所
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-24 出版日期:2011-11-15 发布日期:2011-11-15
  • 作者简介: 彭峰(1977), 女,湖南龙山人。上海社会科学院法学研究所副研究员,法学博士,研究方向为环境法、能源法。  
  • 基金资助:

    国家社科基金青年项目(11CFX032)

A Reflection on the Legislation of China' s Atomic Energy

  1. Institute of Law, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences
  • Received:2011-08-24 Online:2011-11-15 Published:2011-11-15

摘要:

日本福岛核事故以来,全球核能界开始新一轮反思,国际社会出现了“弃核”和“保核”两种不同观点,前者以德国为代表,后者以法国和美国为代表。由于我国能源结构中对传统化石能源的严重依赖,为保障能源安全,应对气候变化,清洁化能源,考虑到核电在我国能源结构中比例较低的现状,发展核电的方向不应改变。基于对美国、法国、日本原子能立法现状的分析和比较,为保障核能产业的健康发展,我国《原子能法》的起草应定位为以环境保护为优先,安全第一,经济性、市场化推动并重,并应进一步理清核能监管体制、建立核污染保险制度。
关键词:

关键词:  核能, 产业, 原子能法

Abstract:

Since the nuclear disaster at Fukushima, the global nuclear circle has started a new round of reflection on atomic energy. And in the international community, there appear two different views of "denuclearization" and "nuclearpreserving". While the former is represented by Germany, the latter is characterized by France and the United States. In view of China' s actualities of energy structure—depending heavily on traditional fossil energy and the proportion of nuclear power being low—it should not change its direction of developing nuclear power so as to guarantee energy safety, combat global warming and cleanse energy. At the same time, based on the comparison and analysis of the legislation of atomic energy between the United States, France and Japan, and in order to ensure the healthy development of nuclear energy industry, China should take environmental protection as priority, put safety first and lay equal stress on economics and marketization in its orientation of drafting of Atomic Energy Law. After that, it should go further to improve regulatory system for nuclear energy and establish insurance system for nuclear pollution.
 

Key words: nuclear energy, industry, Atomic Energy Law

中图分类号: