Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition) ›› 2011, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 103-115.
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Abstract: The present supervision system of the stateshared enterprise is not able to prevent the threat of corruption from the stateowned enterprise. Just take an enterprise as example. A contrast of related laws, and an analysis of the shortcoming of the supervision system of the stateshared enterprise, can discover that it is the absence of supervision function in management regulation that causes such problems as corruption and property erode. While the existing design of supervision system does not agree with the feature of publiclyowned economy as well as the demand of supervision work, the constructing mode and the power deployment of the management organization result in the personal arbitrary decision of the stateowned enterprise. In detail, there are following shortcomings: (1) Since the proprietor and its representative do not produce a good system of restricting agents, the group company acts as the controlling shareholder in the form of the agent of government, being both the controlling company and the enterprise. And noncontrolling shareholders, including foreign shareholders and private shareholders, are difficult to take effect. (2) The system of the director board is so short of conditionality that the director and the manager are actually combined into one. Hence, decisionmaking mechanism and work division form the organizational foundation of personal arbitrary action. The selection of the independent director is not independent, and the constitution of the salary committee doesn' t stand alone. (3) The existing organizational structure results in the absence of the leader supervision function of censor board and inspecting commission. On the one hand, the supervisor has such a low rank and power that he accomplishes nothing; and on the other hand, the leading body of supervision and the functional supervision department of internal enterprise confuse mutually. What' s more, internal control system is not strict, and employee supervision organization is only an empty shell. (4) The existing supervision subject of management structure is characteristic of parochialism. In the management structure of enterprises, there are not such positions as ultimate proprietors, original agents and initial clients. To a large extent, the supervision position of the enterprise party organization is empty. For the stateowned enterprise, the trustiest supervision subject is the public or the employee as the proprietor. To realize the effective supervision of stateowned economy, it is necessary to depend on multiple stateowned property, balanced organizational structure and democratic management supervision.
LI Ji-An. The Supervision Mechanism of the StateShared Enterprise in the Management System ——Taking an Enterprise as the Study Case[J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2011, 18(4): 103-115.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2011/V18/I4/103
参考文献: [1] 李维安,张亚双. 如何构造适合国情的公司治理监督机制——论我国监事会的功能定位[J]. 财经科学, 2002,(2):6366. [2] 刘永佶. 社会主义民主:公有制的法制保证[J]. 国家行政学院学报,2002,(1):6771. [3] 张跃平,刘荆敏. 委托代理激励理论实证研究综述[J]. 经济学动态,2003,(6):7478. [4] 唐清泉,罗党论. 设立独立董事的效果分析——来自中国上市公司独立董事的问卷调查[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006,(1):120127. [5] 赵宇恒. 国有企业管理者激励补偿效应——政府的角色[J]. 经济管理,2009,(5):103111. [6] 包毅,黄晓锋. 当代西方国家监管国有企业的模式及其启示[J]. 中国矿业大学学报:社会科学版,2005,(3):9699.