The standards-based AI regulatory model will not only profoundly affect the evolution trajectory of AI technology and the development prospects of the industry, but is also pivotal for the degree of cooperation among multiple actors and the establishment of national interests and global competitiveness. Developed countries have successively incorporated standards into their national AI strategies, positioning standards as a crucial tool to synergize the forces of the AI industry and achieve multi-party co-governance. It is necessary to compare the differences and similarities between the standard regulatory systems of China, the United States and Europe from the perspective of comparative law, and clarify the competitive factors presented by the market, government and public-private partnerships, thereby offering pathways for optimizing China’s standard regulatory system. In addition, to advance“AI for good,”it is necessary to foster a synergistic balance between standards and law, market and government, and domestic and international standardization. Such an approach will not only bolster China’s leadership in AI technology and enhance its legal and regulatory maturity but will also contribute to the concerted progress of global AI standards and regulations as a whole.

AI, standard, regulation, competition, coordination, fundamental rights