Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition)
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The public sphere, which is a middle zone managed by both country and society, will not enhance the harmonious development of society without the positive interaction between public power and social actors. At present, China is going through rapid social transformation. With the political situation and historical background of the Communist Party in power and many parties in cooperation, as well as the influence of the traditional culture, the maturity of social actors, who are a complicated and passive part of society, is of great significance to the construction of China' s public sphere. In a pluralistic society, social actors are interest groups that mainly include elite, middleclass and vulnerable ones. These social actors cause many problems in the public sphere such as the following: when the "Pareto Optimality" of benefit is not realized, their selfish instinct distorts the "public" feature of the public sphere and makes possible "freerider" participation; when confusion and deviation appear in their political personality during the transition period, their participation in the public sphere becomes disordered, ineffective and politically indifferent; when trapped in the traditional binary interpretation of "home" and "country" as well as the belief in "subject culture" and authoritative character, they tend to sacrifice public consciousness and initiative for the worship and pursuit of authority. Based on these, to help the social actors become more mature, a comprehensive system should be constructed to serve the development of citizen morality, the improvement of modern political personality and the cultivation of citizen culture. This external system, along with the internal culture, will provide independent, rational and active participation subjects, i.e. "citizens" in a real sense, for the building of China' s public sphere. And the public power, whose core is the ruling party, will be the key factor in deciding whether the construction of China' s public sphere is successful or not.
Key words: public spheres, social actors, political personality, political culture
CLC Number:
D089
SHEN Rui-Ying, WANG Min-Jie. A Brief Discussion on Social Actors in China' s Public Sphere[J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition).
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2012/V29/I5/57
[1] 尤尔根·哈贝马斯.关于公共领域问题的答问[J]. 社会学研究,1999,(3):3536. [2] 谢立中.西方社会学名著提要[M]. 南昌:江西人民出版社,1998:150. [3] 孙立平.总体性资本与转型期精英形成[J]. 浙江学刊,2002,(3):100105. [4] 网易新闻.众多大学领导成腐败“硕鼠”说明啥[EB/OL].(20100625)[20100816]. http://news.163.com/10/0625/15/6A1KB7F6000146BD.html. [5] 刘耿.上海滩的社区“新管家”[J]. 中国社会工作,2009,(31):1820. [6] 查尔斯·赖特·米尔斯. 白领——美国的中产阶级[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,1987:327. [7] 张春明.我国城市中等收入阶层政治参与的萌动和疏离——五大城市城市中等收入阶层政治参与调查[J]. 社会科学家,2006,(6):4851,55. [8] 邵岭.小区业委会缘何难产[EB/OL].(20071221)[20100810]. http://house.xinmin.cn/special/ywhnmddc/xgyd/2007/12/21/997835.html. [9] 何平立,沈瑞英.对中国模式的挑战:“纵向民主”与中产阶层发育问题[J]. 社会科学研究,2010,(4):6873. [10] 《华尔街日报》中文版. 中国经济飞速增长 社会动荡加剧[EB/OL].(20110926)[20110930]. http://cn.wsj.com/gb/20110926/bch 105945.asp?source=article. [11] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集:第1卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1956:82. [12] 闵琦.中国政治文化——民主政治难产的社会心理因素[M]. 昆明:云南人民出版社,1989:33. [13] 李艳丽.影响当前中国政治发展的政治心理因素分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报,2006,(6):769773. [14] 丛知.公民公共精神缺失的社会根源与催生的“土壤”[J]. 福建行政学院学报,2008,(6):6367. [15] 殷海光.中国文化的展望[M]. 上海:上海三联书店,2002:102. [16] 中国新闻周刊. 8成富二代不愿接班愿当官. [EB/OL].(20120315)[20120316]. http://news.inewsweek.cn/news22051.html. [17] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集:第2卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1995:32. [18] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集:第4卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1995:697. [19] 埃德加·博登海默. 法理学——法哲学及其方法[M]. 北京:华夏出版社,1987:361. [20] 江泽民.全面建设小康社会 开创中国特色社会主义事业新局面——在中国共产党第十六次全国代表大会上的报告[R]. 北京:人民出版社,2002:32. [21] 加布里埃尔·阿尔蒙德.公民文化[M]. 北京:华夏出版社,1989:17. [22] 埃里希·弗洛姆.为自己的人[M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1992:4143. [23] 马庆钰.告别西西弗斯:中国政治文化分析与展望[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002. [24] 颜海林,张秀.论有限政府的基本特质[J]. 湖南大学学报:社会科学版,2010,(1):5456. [25] 加布里埃尔·阿尔蒙德,小G·宾厄姆·鲍威尔. 比较政治学:体系、过程和政策[M]. 上海:上海译文出版社,1987:4142. [26] 汪利锬.社会问责与公共信息供给:理论与启示[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2011,(3):310.