Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition)
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Since the nuclear disaster at Fukushima, the global nuclear circle has started a new round of reflection on atomic energy. And in the international community, there appear two different views of "denuclearization" and "nuclearpreserving". While the former is represented by Germany, the latter is characterized by France and the United States. In view of China' s actualities of energy structure—depending heavily on traditional fossil energy and the proportion of nuclear power being low—it should not change its direction of developing nuclear power so as to guarantee energy safety, combat global warming and cleanse energy. At the same time, based on the comparison and analysis of the legislation of atomic energy between the United States, France and Japan, and in order to ensure the healthy development of nuclear energy industry, China should take environmental protection as priority, put safety first and lay equal stress on economics and marketization in its orientation of drafting of Atomic Energy Law. After that, it should go further to improve regulatory system for nuclear energy and establish insurance system for nuclear pollution.
Key words: nuclear energy, industry, Atomic Energy Law
CLC Number:
 
D912.6
BANG Feng. A Reflection on the Legislation of China' s Atomic Energy[J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition).
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2011/V18/I6/69
[1] 日本环境部. 日本将向IAEA提交福岛核事故报告[EB/OL]. (20110607)[20110627]. 人民网:http://world.people.com.cn/GB/14841345.html. [2] 日本环境部. 日本福岛核事故上调至最高级7级[EB/OL]. (20110413)[20110627]. 人民网:http://world.people.com.cn/GB/57507/14375516.html. [3] 刘向. 就核电退出时间表 德国政府与各州达成一致,[EB/OL]. (20110606)[20110702]. http://www.energylaw.org.cn/html/news/2011/6/6/2011662112467941.html. [4] 肖欣. 法德因“核”不同 民意推动国际能源新格局[EB/OL]. (20110606)[20110702]. http://www.energylaw.org.cn/html/news/2011/6/6/2011662112467941.html. [5] 网易解读. 你不知道的中国核电大跃进[EB/OL]. (20110321)[20110702]. http://www.enegylaw.org.cn/html/news/2011/3/21/201103212253341333.html. [6] 温家宝. 主持召开国务院常务会议听取应对日本福岛核电站泄漏有关情况的汇报[EB/OL]. (20110317)[20110702]. http://www.energylaw.org.ca/html/news/2011/3/17/201131720351757.html. [7] 王硕. 《原子能法》拟年底征求意见,孕育27年两次夭折[EB/OL]. (20110425)[20110702]. http://news.xinhua net.com/legel/20110425/c121344273.html. [8] 阎正. 美国核法律与国家能源政策[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2006. [9] 约瑟夫·P·托梅因,理查德·D·卡达希. 美国能源法[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2008. [10] IEA. Energy Policies of IEA countries: France 2009 Reviews[EB/OL]. (20100501)[20110416]. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2009/france2009.pdf. [11] 法国大使馆. 法国民用核能发展史[EB/OL]. (20090327)[20110416]. http://www.ambafrancecn.org/%E6%B3%95%E5%9B%BD%E7%9A%84%E6%A0%B8%E8%83%BD.html. [12] 彭峰. 法典化的迷思:法国环境法之考察[M]. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2010. [13] 朴光姬.日本的能源[M]. 北京.经济科学出版社,2008. [14] 叶荣泗,吴钟瑚.中国能源法律体系研究[M]. 北京.中国电力出版社,2006:205.