Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition)
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
t is well known that goodness and evilness are man' s basic forms of value. While goodness is worthy of promotion, evilness deserves punishment, which is the essence of character accomplishment. But, what is the meaning for goodness and evilness? Maybe it is not very clear to everybody. A common view is considering goodness or evilness as one of man' s unchangeable, objective characters. The former is reasonable, for the benefit of others; and the latter means appetency, showing selfness. Actually, it is a distortive interpretation. Another popular view in history is using bitterness or sweetness to replace goodness or evilness. While goodness brings about sweetness, evilness produces bitterness. That saying is also unbelievable. Bitterness or sweetness does not derive so much from goodness or evilness as from beauty or ugliness. As a matter of fact, goodness and evilness are determined by public opinions that comprise personal desires. Just as satisfying does goodness, dissatisfying produces evilness. Human beings have their public opinions of transcending national countries and histories, which make up the universality of goodness and evilness. And different histories or nations have different public opinions, which constitute the relativity of goodness and evilness. Key words: 〖WTBZ]
Key words: goodness and evilness, rational desire, others and oneself, bitterness and sweetness, public opinion, relativity
QI Zhi-Xiang. Goodness as the Desirable Selfishness and Goodness as the Public Opinion ——A View of Goodness and Evilness[J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition).
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2011/V18/I5/71
[1] 张建华. 推到红墙——克里姆林宫最新档案解秘[M]. 北京:中央编译出版社,1998:165168. [2] 培根. 培根论人生[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,1983:5. [3] 宾克莱. 理想的冲突——西方社会中变化着的价值观念[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1988:141. [4] 包尔生. 伦理学原理[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988. [5] 周辅成. 西方伦理学名著选辑:上卷[C]. 北京:商务印书馆,1987:95. [6] 罗素. 西方哲学史:上卷[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1981:309. [7] 李仲融. 希腊哲学史[M]. 上海:开明书店,1940:223. [8] 北京大学哲学系美学教研室. 西方美学家论美和美感[C]. 北京:商务印书馆,1982. [9] 祁志祥. 美丑观:悦情为美,痛苦为丑[J]. 上海大学学报:社会科学版,2010,(3):6170. [10] 爱因·兰德. 客观主义的伦理学·自私的美德:利己主义的新概念[M]. 纽约:新美国世界文学文库,1964:17. [11] 卢梭. 社会契约论[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1963:36. [12] 黑格尔. 小逻辑[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1980:333. [13] 赵修义,等. 现代西方哲学纲要[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社, 1987:139. [14] 克莱宾. 理想的冲突[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1983:9. [15] 斯宾诺莎. 神、人及其幸福简论[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1987. [16] 英国《每日电评报》记者. 穿全身罩袍女性在法将被罚款[N]. 参考消息,20100110(6)