Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition)
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The DeElitism in China' s Contemporary Paintings(School of Fine Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China) Abstract: The traditional elite painting is of minority art, which serves the people in the upper society. This kind of art, after undergoing a transformation of era, dies a natural death. Under the condition of contemporary market of art, the difference between elites and nonelites is related closely to social identity and service object. While the elite artist mainly serves the people in the upper society, the nonelite artist takes the people in the lower and middle societies as main service object. Both have more difference in economic income and less difference in artistic quality. Therefore, for China' s contemporary paintings, there is no cultural elite connotation but economic meaning. Of course, in order to seek for survival, part of contemporary paintings will choose a creative mode of the "false elegance". But what most of painters create are "vulgar" works displaying worldly desires. The emergence of these circumstances has something to do with the excessive difference between wealth and poverty. It is the arty fashion from wealthy people and the material incentive means from cultural administrations that make China' s contemporary paintings being the market victims short of cultural indications.
Key words: elite painting, minority art, deelitism, commerce painting, art market
WANG Hong-Xi. The DeElitism in China' s Contemporary Paintings[J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition).
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2011/V18/I5/118
[1] 贺万里.中国古代文人画的自娱功能与儒家教化功能观[J] . 宁夏大学学报:社会科学版,2004,26,(1):103110. [2] 刘水平.文化变迁:精英艺术与大众文化[J] . 文艺评论,2004,(1):410. [3] 张宇靖.论美第奇家族对意大利文艺复兴的贡献[J] . 解放军外国语学院学报,2009,(3):113114. [4] 康定斯基.艺术中的精神[M] . 李政文,魏大海,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:104. [5] 米歇尔.图像理论[M] . 陈永国,胡文正,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:208. [6] 张英,陈军吉,黄婷.“就是一个体制问题”——吴冠中谈中国美术现状[N] . 南方周末,2008 0110(D21). [7] 蒋鑫.试论行画的市场意义[J] . 河南科技大学学报:社会科学版,2010,28(2): 7274. [8] 彭锋.日常生活的审美变容[J] . 文艺争鸣,2010,(9):4647. [9] Kelly Devine Thomas.The Selling of Jeff Koons[J/OL].(20050510)[20101005] . http://artnews.com/issues/article.asp?art_id=2409. [10] 黄宗贤.话语转向与价值重构——略谈中国当代艺术的价值取向[J] . 美术观察,2010,(10):97101. [11] 游一默.惊叹于“世界艺术大师”横空出世[J] . 上海档案,2003,(3):2627. [12] 《收藏界》编辑部. 中国当代艺术家xxx[J] . 收藏界,2005,(2):107107. [13] 《世界发明》编辑部.要么豪车,要么自行车——中国当代艺术家的生存状况[J] . 世界发明,2007,(11):4143. [14] 周韶华. 《汉语雄风》画展自白[J] . 湖北美术学院学报,2005,(3):4044,27. [15] 韦尔申. 时代的精神性表达[J] . 文艺争鸣,2010,(6):33. [16] 冷如冰霜.深圳卖画[J] . 中华散文,2007,(9):5458. [17] 刘水平.精英艺术:神的诞生与隐退[J] . 艺术广角,2008,(3):710. [18] 张晓凌.我对九届全国美展的看法[J] . 美术观察,2000,(2):1111. [19] 赵培智.画家、市场与学术[J] . 美术观察,2008,(1):114114. [20] 朱国华:学术语言的几个层次——兼论晦涩[J] . 福建论坛:人社版,2006,(10):7578. [21] 陈占彪:晦涩难懂就是学问高深吗?[J] . 社会观察,2008,(10):1616. [22] 唐纳德·雷诺兹,罗斯玛丽·兰伯特,苏珊·伍德福特. 剑桥艺术史:3[M] . 钱乘旦,罗修通,译.北京:中国青年出版社,1994:299. [23] 陈履生. 当代美术家能否适应重大历史题材[J]. 当代中国画,2007,(5):8081.