Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition)
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Conscience Mechanism in the Perspective of Evaluation Theory(School of Social Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)Abstract: Conscience, as a core concept in Kant's philosophical system, should occupy a prominent position in Kant's philosophy. This is because: first, conscience is "a judgment formed by one for self"; secondly, conscience is based on good will; thirdly, conscience produces respect sentiments for moral principles by way of compulsory consciousness. Hegel discusses conscience from these three aspects: conscience is "a universal self-reflection"; conscience is "an absolute selfconfidence within behavioral agents"; conscience is the "only thing restricting oneself". While human beings act as social animals, conscience is a psychological mechanism formed by the operation of social norms on human beings. Individual conscience is a kind of internalization, both of social basic norms and of social basic values. Therefore, conscience can be considered both as the social basic norms or social basic values of individual patterns, and as the individual patterns of social "conscience". The social norms in the pattern of conscience are not specific but basic, displaying social rationality and spiritual faith. Conscience has four levels: compassion, shame, humility and rightandwrong. And the last also contains two levels: the acceptance of facts and the pursuit of justice. Conscience works by way of emotion. Socalled "uneasiness of conscience" is actually "moral disturbance", because conscience takes peace as pleasure and uneasiness as affliction; In individual selfevaluation, conscience often works by way of uneasiness or condemnation, thus making the individual immersed in some sort of emotional pain. The uneasiness or condemnation of conscience within individuals actually embodies the uneasiness or condemnation of social subjects on individual behaviors. The evaluation activity carried by individuals with the standard of conscience is doublelined: both the selfevaluation of individuals and the evaluation of society on individuals, that is, the one of taking individuals' selfevaluation as a unique form. While the evaluation of society on individuals turns into individuals' selfevaluation, individuals take a unique form of selfevaluation to embody the evaluation of society on individuals. This is the theoretical evaluation mechanism of conscience uneasiness or condemnation. As for confession, it is a specific form of selfevaluation. And very often, it is by way of confession that conscience expresses uneasiness or condemnation. Many wellknown persons in history possess a deep sense of confession.
Key words: Key words: conscience; sense of right and wrong; condemnation; confession
CLC Number:
B018
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2010/V17/I1/29
[1] 康德. 单纯理性限度内的宗教[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:198. [2] 康德. 实践理性批判[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2003. [3] 康德. 道德形而上学原理[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,1986. [4] 黑格尔. 法哲学原理[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1982. [5] 黑格尔. 精神现象学:下卷[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1979:155156. [6] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1972: [7] 列宁. 哲学笔记[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1974:233. [8] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集:第6卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1961. [9] 皮亚杰. 儿童心理学[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1980. [10] 查尔斯·霍顿·库利. 社会本性与社会秩序[M]. 北京:华夏出版社,1989:246. [11] R F Baumeister. A historical Transformation of Psychological Development[J]. Psychological Perspectives on the Self, 1986,(3):186. [12] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集:第42卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1979:169. [13] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第1卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1956:134. [14] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第3卷[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1960:34. [15] 《哲学大辞典》编纂委员会. 哲学大辞典[Z]. 上海:上海辞书出版社,2001:447. [16] 拉法格. 思想起源论[M]. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1963:67. [17] 亚里士多德. 政治学[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1997:153. [18] 康德. 形而上学探本[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1956:43. [19] 博登海默. 法理学——法哲学及其方法[M]. 北京:华夏出版社,1987:253. [20] 穆勒. 功用主义[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1957:48. [21] 麦金太尔. 谁之正义?何种合理?[M]. 北京:当代中国出版社,1996:56. [22] M.J.艾德勤. 西方思想宝库[M]. 长春:吉林人民出版社,1988:951. [23] 王海明.公正论[J]. 中国人民大学学报,1999,( 5):4853. [24] 亚理士多德. 亚理士多德全集:第8卷[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1992:96. [25] 罗尔斯. 正义论[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:3. [26] 拉斐尔. 道德哲学[M]. 沈阳:辽宁教育出版社·牛津大学出版社,1998:86. [27] 黑格尔. 逻辑学:下卷[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1976:522. [28] 布罗日克. 价值与评价[M]. 北京:知识出版社,1988:120121. [29] 刘亚明. 中国佛教忏悔思想研究[D].成都:四川大学,2005 [30] 周晓琳. 中国文学的忏悔意识[J]. 四川师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,2000,(5):2530 [31] 奥古斯丁. 忏悔录[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1996:247. [32] 陈思和. 巴金图传[M]. 广州:广东教育出版社,2002:130.