Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition)
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
As the most authoritative, and also the most prestigious science awards, the Nobel prizes in natural science attract more and more attentions. Scholars both at home and abroad, from different viewpoints of humanities and social sciences, such as philosophy, science history and science sociology, make a research and achieve a number of results. This essay, from the perspective of science philosophy, or, to be exact, from the perspective of the scientific knowledge and methodology, and, by a close combination of the detailed information provided by Nobel prizes in natural science, makes an interpretation of the essential concept of the "interdisciplinary". On the one hand, the author traces a brief history of the establishment of this concept, pointing out that the interdisciplinary research, in essence, can be regarded as the breakthrough of the limits between different subjects, or the crossing of the borders between different "modes", or the conversion of different "modes"; and on the other hand, by a statistical analysis of the interdisciplinary research results from the exciting Nobel prizes in natural science, he highlights the development trend of the interdisciplinary natural sciences since the beginning of the 20th century, showing that the significant discoveries and inventions in modern science and technology are mostly resulted in interdisciplinary subjects, and that both major breakthroughs in science and technology and the emergence of new growth points and new subjects are often not be separated from each other' s crossing and infiltration of different subjects, thus underlining the significance of the interdisciplinary research. At the same time, through the examination of the knowledge backgrounds of the Nobel prize winners in natural science, he finds that, since most of winners have a wide range of interests and hobbies, not only being deep but also being profound in scientific knowledge, the interdisciplinary knowledge background can be considered as one of the main factors that stimulate scientists' rich imaginations, break their habits of thinking and obtain original results. What' s more, he has a statistical analysis of the proportion of the cooperative items and winner numbers in different periods, not only displaying the increasing cooperative trend of the research for the Nobel prizes in natural science, but also showing that the wellknown principle of Marx' s economics——"productivity resulted in collaboration——can also be applied to the research for the Nobel prizes in natural science. In a word, the interdisciplinary research not only demands researchers' knowledge background of understanding multidisciplinary crossing, but also relies on scientists' collaboration in various studies.
Key words: Key words: the Nobel prizes in natural science; interdisciplinary; interdisciplinary research; knowledge background; cooperative research
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/
https://www.jsus.shu.edu.cn/EN/Y2009/V16/I5/48
[1] 约翰·齐曼. 真科学——它是什么, 它指什么[M]. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 2002:258. [2] 罗伯特·马克·弗里德曼.权谋:诺贝尔科学奖的幕后[M]. 上海:上海科技教育出版社,2005. [3] J·D·贝尔纳.历史上的科学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1981:368. [4] W·I·B·贝弗里奇. 科学研究的艺术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979:58. [5] 伊什特万·豪尔吉陶伊. 通往斯德哥尔摩之路——诺贝尔奖、科学和科学家[M]. 上海:上海科技教育出版社, 2007:243. [6] 陈其荣,袁闯,陈积芳.理性与情结——世纪诺贝尔奖[C]. 上海:复旦大学出版社,2002:355. [7] 梁立明,武夷山.科学计量学:理论探索与案例研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2006:186. [8] 哈里特·朱克曼.科学界的精英——美国的诺贝尔奖金获得者[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1979:243. [9] 杨福生,赵兴太.诺贝尔医学奖获奖启示录[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社,1997:299.